I don't rag on people, editor-surveyor!!! As a matter of principle!
I do not know to what posts you are referring. Please help me out here?
The only things I remember saying in recent times about Newt or Sarah was something along the following lines:
I "opined" that Sarah Palin — who I deeply admire and totally respect — would probably very much dislike living in the "fishbowl" of the Oval Office, on grounds of natural temperament, and the belief that she can accomplish MORE for the conservative cause outside of government than in it. That is simply my "intuition" talking.... It may be wrong or right.
As for Newt: I have tremendous respect and gratitude for the man who sheperded the Contract with America through Congress during the '90s; and who bargained Clinton into finally accepting welfare reform, which the latter was vehemently opposed to and determined to resist. Newt is a brilliant intellect, and has been a highly effective political operator in the past.
The problem that I see with Gingrich (whether it's there in your eyes or not) is that somewhere along the line, some bolt came loose. He wants to be acknowledged as the "smartest guy in the room" everywhere he goes. Indeed, he thinks he is. Evaluating him on grounds of sheer narcissism (these days), it seems to me he's just as bad as Obama. I have reason to suspect that he has become mentally unbalanced in consequence.
You wrote:
Is your solution really to jump on board with the Luciferian for the sake of party unity?I am not preeminently interested in "party unity." What I'm interested in is party success — in defeating a criminal mobster and removing him from the White House. I am of course aware that it will take a unified party to do that.
But that is not what we have.
Plus I am quite a bit put off by your association of me with Lucifer. Just because I don't agree with you, does this make me the Devil's spawn???
Oh, pul-eeeeezze.... How totally gratuitous, mindless....
You say "Most of the GOP base wants 'anybody but Romney' to be our candidate, and will willingly support 'anybody but Romney'.”
Well, I don't know about the "most of the GOP base," but I certainly know that is the sentiment of a great many of my respected friends around here.
But if what you say is true, dear editor-surveyor, then the GOP WILL go down in defeat, next November.
And then, ask yourself: What happens next? Do you want Obama to pick the next Supreme Court justice, for instance?
In my estimation, there is very little objective chance of there being a viable "anybody but Romney" candidate at this late stage. Romney's fundraising skills and (even more important) his breathtaking organizational skills put any serious challenge to him from within the party in the category of "not likely to happen." But we'll see about that....
Dear editor-surveyor: I am a political realist, not an ideologist.
The Democrat party knows "how to WIN."
The Republicans know "how to brawl" — which means they do not WIN. Many would rather be "right" than to "win."
JMHO FWIW
>> “I do not know to what posts you are referring. Please help me out here?” <<
.
BB, I replied to your #7, which was to katiedidit1’s #1
You seemed to object to the assertion that the majority would much rather have someone other than Romney.
>> “I am quite a bit put off by your association of me with Lucifer. Just because I don’t agree with you, does this make me the Devil’s spawn???” <<
.
I made no such association. I asked the pertinent question. The true dividing line in all this is not our rejection of Romney, but his and that of his core support, to a more effective and proper candidate that would please the majority, and have some realistic chance of actually improving our situation, rather than merely reducing our slide toward perdition to a flatter slope.
Unbeknown to most Mormons, apparently, is the fact that mormonism is no more nor less that a slight variant of freemasonry; a continuation of ancient Babylonian Luciferian worship.
Mormonism, like its parent, freemasonry, hides its true nature from the masses of its membership, revealing it only to its trusted core. Romney is a member of that core, and as such is the true enemy of Christian America just as much as his brother in belief, Barack Obama.
His main support base in the party are of similar ilk. They are like him Luciferians at heart, and will not willingly support a Christian, nor a truly observant Jew. That is what truly divides the party, and stiffles our ability to win.
The question that I asked you is do you support joining them just to win a symbolic election for the party, or are you willing to work with us to attempt a real victory for God fearing America while it appears to remain possible?
.
p.s.:
I need to elaborate that statement.
It seems to me that the GOP has the "best" ideas right now. Unfortunately, the GOP has no real strategy, not to mention the tactics necessary to carry out any strategy.
In other words, they may be "right" on the foundational principles of American society; but they have no real strategy for carrying them forward.
On the other hand, we have the Democrat party, which is utterly mindless; It has no good ideas at all.
All of its ideas have repeatedly been tried in human history, and every single time they have shown themselves impoverished in terms of securing individual liberty, prosperity, and well-being.
But such ideas have surely boosted the fortunes of tyrants, anytime they have bee tried.
May it be noted that all these failed "progressivist" schemes presided over incalculable human misery while they prevailed....
They have caused the deaths of millions of human beings just within the last century — the bloodiest century known to man in the history of humankind.
Notwithstanding they have no ideas at all that have not already been tried and condemned by history, the Democrat party knows how to win elections. And they don't care by what means it takes to win them.
I imagine they are placing all their bets on the current corrupt moral climate of America these days. They think they can literally "get away with murder" — for there's no one around to look after the interests of the victim....
Has America fallen so low????
They know they cannot wield power and influence unless they can get their people into positions of power.
I imagine it is the rare conservative who thinks in terms of "power" and the "influence" it gives one....
The "Other Side" has the worst ideas imaginable; but they definitely know the "logistics" of how to "WIN" elections.
And that's why they "routinely" beat us. And maybe will beat us again, next November.