Replies

For years students in this country have been taught that no foreigner/non citizen could come here and have a child that could become president.

Such as PRESIDENT Chester A. Arthur? Strange how Arthur's many enemies NEVER pointed out how his parents were British citizens.

The Democrats did allege Chester Arthur was not eligible to the Office of the Vice President or the Office of the President. They failed to uncover the valid evidence of ineligibility when they failed to discover the date of naturalization of his father, and they relied instead on obviously erroneous evidence falsely alleging birth outside of the United States.

The Democrats raised the claims against a number of other Republicans claiming they too were ineligible to the Office of the President all the way from Wilson's election to the defeat of McCain. So, Democrats claiming a candidate was not a natural born citizen is quite common, including Hillary Clinton and her supporters’ claims that Obama was ineligible due to his not being a natural born citizen.

The Democrats did allege Chester Arthur was not eligible to the Office of the Vice President or the Office of the President. They failed to uncover the valid evidence of ineligibility when they failed to discover the date of naturalization of his father, and they relied instead on obviously erroneous evidence falsely alleging birth outside of the United States.

The Democrats raised the claims against a number of other Republicans claiming they too were ineligible to the Office of the President all the way from Wilson's election to the defeat of McCain. So, Democrats claiming a candidate was not a natural born citizen is quite common, including Hillary Clinton and her supporters’ claims that Obama was ineligible due to his not being a natural born citizen.

It is interesting that you choose Chester A. Arthur as an example since he had the same problem Obama has and he used the same solution, hide the truth about his history. Arthur lied about his father being a citizen at his birth because he knew that the son of a British subject could not be president. He burned his historical papers.

It was convenient that the democrats at the time decided to go after him as being foreign born. He used it as a cover issue that he could easily disprove while obscuring the fact that the real issue was when his father was naturalized (which occurred after Chester’s birth).

It is almost the exact same tactic the democrats are using today to hide the truth about Obama. They get people to chase a birth certificate and a foreign location and the truth will hide in plain sight.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2330695/posts

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2008/12/06/urgent-historical-breakthrough-proof-chester-arthur-concealed-he-was-a-british-subject-at-birth/