Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newt Gingrich vs. Mitt Romney: Comparing Conservative ‘Products of Work’
GulagBound.com ^ | January 30, 2012 | PolitiJim

Posted on 04/22/2012 3:46:58 PM PDT by SoConPubbie

It is terrible that conservatives are out there distorting the records of each candidate. Or worse passing along wrong information without checking facts. All of them have qualifications and disqualifications. But can we get away from what they say they will do and compare what they actually did when they were afforded governing power?

I was talking to a nationally published conservative author and speaker today who had absolutely no clue that Newt Gingrich gave the “keynote” rebuttal AGAINST Al Gore on Cap and Trade legislation. This is a travesty not just of conservative media, but those we surround ourselves with.

Sorry in advance to those supporting Santorum and Paul. For Florida at least, this is a 2 man race. My apologies in advance for the lack of objectivity. The more I read about how wildly Romney lies about his record (and distorts Newt’s), I realize I simply can’t address this without showing emotion. But I am trying to give an ACCURATE snapshot of anything that could be considered conservative or liberal on both.

What are their biggest accomplishments actually governing?

Mitt Romney as MA Governor

Romney’s conservative initiatives?

Romney left office without running for a second term with approval ratings under 35%.

Image by Getty Images via @daylife

Newt Gingrich as GA Congressman and Speaker of the House

Gingrich’s “Liberal” Legislation?

When Newt became Speaker in 1995 congressional approval was about 20%. When he resigned the Speakership four years later, it was about 60%. Now it’s 11%.

Observations

It is interesting how Romney is mostly lauded for conservative positions he never implemented, or was able to pass, when he was a governing leader and Gingrich is chastised for supposed liberal positions for which there is no voting record evidencing it. When it comes down to what they accomplished when in power to govern – Gingrich acted more like a Conservative President, and Romney more like a Compromising Legislator.

Similarly, why there is no evidence that Gingrich ever voted against something he campaigned on, Romney broke numerous pledges to both liberals and conservatives in his state.

So I leave it up to you to conclude who is more likely to do what they say.


(If I have omitted any major legislation that was passed into law for either – please submit in contact page so I can add it). Footnote: **Santorum lifetime ACU rating is only 83%, 84% for 1998 alone. David Keene, who headed the organization during most of Gingrich’s 20 years in Congress, said Gingrich’s rating is high in part because the issues on which he deviated were not voted on in Congress, and votes determine the group’s scorecard. While he’s not a conservative, he’s a partisan. He’s done a lot for conservatives. His speakership was basically conservative,” said Keene, who calls Gingrich a friend but is neutral in the 2012 race. Keene gives no substantive fact for his assertion and doesn’t explain why Gingrich wouldn’t vote for non-conservative positions if indeed he wasn’t a conservative. He similarly doesn’t comment on Santorum’s ideas that didn’t make it into law or Romney’s.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: belongsinbloggers; gingrich; mostpopularcongress; newt; newtgingrich; newtkillscapandtrade; newtvscapandtrade; nocapandtrade; romney; superpac; superpacnotworking; supplyside; supplysideeconomics; winningourfuture
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: SoConPubbie

I dont know why you keep saying I’m supporting Romney, other than trying to deflect. And I’m not saying anything negative about Gingrich, just the hypocrisy of some of the newer supporters.


21 posted on 04/22/2012 7:56:02 PM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

In 5 months, without any of Newt’s record changing, you went from will not vote to actively promoting. That is flip flopping. There was no earth shattering moment where Newt changed any of that in the past 5 months.


22 posted on 04/22/2012 7:58:50 PM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Raider Sam
In 5 months, without any of Newt’s record changing, you went from will not vote to actively promoting. That is flip flopping. There was no earth shattering moment where Newt changed any of that in the past 5 months.

Sorry, but another failed analogy by you again.

My complete conversion to Pro-Life did not happen over years, it happened over a matter of days.

I got new information, more insight and changed immediately.

With Newt, I came to the decision over a very short period of time as well, after learning that Cain had dropped out and that I was left with two choices, Newt or Rick.

I researched out the records of both more thoroughly including going to Newt's site here "Setting the Record Straight: Newt’s Positions on the Issues and His Record", where he explained either the inaccuracies of so-called common knowledge/accusations or he explained why he was wrong to some of the things he had done.

I was left with a decision on whether or not to choose and accept the word of a Man, who ACTUALLY had a conservative record, and who did not have a record of lying that he had made some mistakes and that some of the accusations made in the media were flat-out wrong or choose a Man who has a documented history of lying and a documented history of left-wing, Progressive Liberal activism.

I chose wisely.

You, on the other hand, despite your protestations, have not chosen wisely in supporting your boy Mitt ROmney.
23 posted on 04/22/2012 8:13:24 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Raider Sam
I dont know why you keep saying I’m supporting Romney, other than trying to deflect. And I’m not saying anything negative about Gingrich, just the hypocrisy of some of the newer supporters.

Really?

All one has to do to confirm the authenticity of your claim is to click on your name and check your postings "In Forum".

What they will readily find, as I did, when perusing your postings, is that you support him implicitly, maybe not explicitly, but that's probably a function of you knowing that Jim has made it clear that there will be no open promoting of Mitt Romney on his site.

Try a little honesty next time, it's refreshing.
24 posted on 04/22/2012 8:16:23 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner; unspun
Word for word, there it is.
Totally ripped off. Just like bloggers usually do. What scumbags.


Actually HumbleGunner,

They reprinted/reposted it with explicit attribution and approval by PolitJim:

"Reprinted with special permission from PolitiJim’s Rants"

Go to the site and read the line directly below the title.
25 posted on 04/22/2012 8:23:50 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson