To: ctdonath2
I'm not sure when his next court date is, but, there might not be a trial. Check out this from another FR Post yesterday:
Florida's statute, as interpreted by the Supreme Court, provides for a pretrial hearing to go over the evidence. If the judge decides, by the preponderance of the evidence, that the defendant acted in self-defense, the case is over. No trial. No voir dire. No stinkin' jury. Also, the statute provides that the defendant is immune from civil action.
Whaddya think? Anybody; chime in.
34 posted on
04/23/2012 11:21:53 AM PDT by
no dems
(TED CRUZ: A PROVEN CONSERVATIVE FOR U.S. SENATE FROM TEXAS.)
To: no dems; All
I'm not sure when his next court date is, but, there might not be a trial. Check out this from another FR Post yesterday:
Florida's statute, as interpreted by the Supreme Court, provides for a pretrial hearing to go over the evidence. If the judge decides, by the preponderance of the evidence, that the defendant acted in self-defense, the case is over. No trial. No voir dire. No stinkin' jury. Also, the statute provides that the defendant is immune from civil action.
Whaddya think? Anybody; chime in.
35 posted on
04/23/2012 11:28:15 AM PDT by
no dems
(TED CRUZ: A PROVEN CONSERVATIVE FOR U.S. SENATE FROM TEXAS.)
To: no dems; jiggyboy
Per
this, methinks all should prep for, er, festivities on May 29.
38 posted on
04/23/2012 11:46:47 AM PDT by
ctdonath2
($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com/)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson