Skip to comments.
Top Dem vows to overturn Supreme Court on immigration (Hand in the cookie jar again)
The Washinton Times ^
| April 24, 2012
| By Stephen Dinan
Posted on 04/24/2012 9:35:56 AM PDT by yoe
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
The hearing came a day before the Supreme Court hears arguments on Arizonas contentious immigration law..." Really? Who is the political hack really shilling for?....pretty obvious...
1
posted on
04/24/2012 9:36:02 AM PDT
by
yoe
To: yoe
Justice would be if Shumer had to leave the senate and work construction. It would be better for his health, and our health.
To: yoe
Chucky Schumer would have prevented the Texas Rangers and the Dallas Police from tracking down Lee Harvey Oswald!
3
posted on
04/24/2012 9:41:55 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: yoe
Sen. Charles Schumer said Tuesday he wants to overturn a Supreme Court ruling last year that allowed states to require businesses to make sure their workers are in the country legally and said Congress should also be prepared to overturn a possible future ruling favoring state enforcement of immigration laws. Is in not joyful when we hear a Senator openly espousing opposition to the rule of law?
4
posted on
04/24/2012 9:42:42 AM PDT
by
rjsimmon
(1-20-2013 The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
To: yoe
Just read a novel where one of the main character’s favorite expressions was, “When the Schumer hits the fan!”. Apropos!
5
posted on
04/24/2012 9:44:11 AM PDT
by
RightWingConspirator
(Obamanation--the most corrupt regime since Robert Mugabe's Zimbabwe)
To: yoe
Where do DemoKKKrats get the idea that latinos are for illegal immigration? None of the latinos I know are for it. Matter of fact they hate it. Have the DemoKKKrats ever heard of the word “competition”? Come to New York city where illegals are regularly employed in construction, road work, bridge repair, which BTW is all sanctioned by our despotic term limit ignoring Mayor and then ask unemployed latinos who came here legally what they think of “amnesty”.
To: muawiyah
If Schumer’s position is that states should not be enforcing Federal laws then I guess employers can stop collecting federal income taxes or forwarding the money to the Treasury.
7
posted on
04/24/2012 9:52:00 AM PDT
by
LetsRok
To: yoe
I believe it is simply too damaging to our economy and too dangerous to our democracy to have 50 states doing 50 different things with regard to immigration policy, said Mr. SchumerHas it occurred to Schmucky Chucky that, out of desperation, the states are being forced to do something that the federal government has utterly failed to do?
8
posted on
04/24/2012 9:52:40 AM PDT
by
Fresh Wind
('People have got to know whether or not their president is a crook.' Richard M. Nixon)
To: yoe
"I believe it is simply too damaging to our economy and too dangerous to our democracy to have 50 states doing 50 different things with regard to immigration policy"
Better than ONE Fed Gov doing NOTHING.
9
posted on
04/24/2012 10:01:09 AM PDT
by
Eagle of Liberty
(We the People are coming!!)
To: yoe
if he thinks he can get 60 votes for that, let him try
To: Fresh Wind
I believe it is simply too damaging to our economy and too dangerous to our democracy to have 50 states doing 50 different things with regard to immigration policy, said Mr. Schumer When SCOTUS upholds Arizona's SB1070, the other states will pass a state law just like it. Then there will be 50 identical SB1070s. Swallow that Chuck.
11
posted on
04/24/2012 10:02:41 AM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
To: yoe
Little Chuckie would scream like crazy if a Repub senator said that Congress should overturn Roe vs Wade. Chuckie is a real piece of work, and that ain’t a compliment
12
posted on
04/24/2012 10:05:37 AM PDT
by
falcon99
To: yoe
’I believe it is simply too damaging to our economy and too dangerous to our democracy to have 50 states doing 50 different things with regard to immigration policy,’ said Mr. Schumer”
Yes, we know Democrats prefer “democracy” (or national head-counting) to federalism. The Constitution doesn’t.
To: SandRat
“Then there will be 50 identical SB1070s”
You’ve hit on precisely what puts the lie to Schumer’s claims. It wouldn’t be 50 different policies, as Arizona’s law took care to mirror federal law. Unlike, say, California’s “sanctuary cities,” all they’re doing is enforcing federal policy on the state level.
But they might as well not have bothered, since people like Schumer are gonna lie about it, just like they lied about it allowing cops to detain and interrogate brown skinned people whenever they feel like it.
To: Tublecane
Just proves that he has never read, really read, the 16 page SB1070.
15
posted on
04/24/2012 10:35:00 AM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
To: yoe
I believe it is simply too damaging to our economy and too dangerous to our democracy to have 50 states doing 50 different things with regard to immigration policy, said Mr. Schumer, New York Democrat and chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committees immigration subcommittee. We are a Republic Charlie -a Republic!
16
posted on
04/24/2012 10:45:55 AM PDT
by
DBeers
(†)
To: yoe
17
posted on
04/24/2012 10:57:02 AM PDT
by
VRWC For Truth
(Throw the bums out who vote yes on the bailout)
To: SandRat
Same thing will happen over Voter ID.
To: yoe
How does this guy keep getting elected! I guess dead people vote in that state too...
19
posted on
04/24/2012 11:14:10 AM PDT
by
jcsjcm
(This country was built on exceptionalism and individualism. In God we Trust - Laus Deo)
To: jcsjcm
I guess dead people vote in that state too... Dead from the neck up.
20
posted on
04/24/2012 11:21:53 AM PDT
by
Lurker
(The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson