Did she refer to Harry Reed once or twice towards the beginning of the interview as "Harry Reems?" Perhaps my ears are playing tricks on me so did anybody else hear that too? Later on she definitely did refer to the budget avoider as Harry Reed.
1 posted on
04/25/2012 7:45:37 AM PDT by
PJ-Comix
To: PJ-Comix
well to be fair one has a big ... and the other is a big ....
2 posted on
04/25/2012 7:50:29 AM PDT by
bravo whiskey
(If the little things really bother you, maybe it's because the big things are going well.)
To: PJ-Comix; Impy; Perdogg; fieldmarshaldj; GSP.FAN
3 posted on
04/25/2012 7:51:32 AM PDT by
GOPsterinMA
(Really?)
To: PJ-Comix
I think she was thinking of something else when she fixed on Harry Reems. Democrat policy, perhaps.
4 posted on
04/25/2012 7:52:07 AM PDT by
Psalm 144
("I'm not willing to light my hair on fire to try and get support. I am who I am." - Willard M Romney)
To: PJ-Comix
Brett does great work when given the opportunity.
To: PJ-Comix
Maybe she meant Harry reams.
6 posted on
04/25/2012 7:52:46 AM PDT by
UCANSEE2
(Lame and ill-informed post)
To: PJ-Comix
Maybe Debbie Downer wad Deep Throat..
Bom Chicka Wah Wah
7 posted on
04/25/2012 7:53:39 AM PDT by
socal_parrot
(I hate to say I told you so, but...)
To: PJ-Comix
She did say Harry Reems. Perhaps she was a fan.
8 posted on
04/25/2012 7:53:39 AM PDT by
luvbach1
(Stop the destruction in 2012 or continue the decline)
To: PJ-Comix
Talking to this hack is like talking to a demented Chatty Cathy - pull her string and out comes the same inane lies, over & over.
15 posted on
04/25/2012 8:02:42 AM PDT by
skeeter
To: PJ-Comix
If so, Rush might want to consider a re-branding of “Dingy Harry.”
There could be some legal hurdles to clear I suppose.
16 posted on
04/25/2012 8:07:31 AM PDT by
Steely Tom
(If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
To: PJ-Comix
On what subject did Brett “corner” her?
Or, do i really have to listen to that harpie?
I changed channels last night just to avoid her...
19 posted on
04/25/2012 8:17:52 AM PDT by
G Larry
(Criminals thrive on the indulgence of society's understanding)
To: PJ-Comix
she tried to avert his questions.and she evaded her eyes.
20 posted on
04/25/2012 8:21:02 AM PDT by
Jeff Chandler
(You mean we have a choice between M.R. and B.O.?)
To: PJ-Comix
Wasserman Schlutz said Harry Reems?
21 posted on
04/25/2012 9:14:25 AM PDT by
TigersEye
(Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
To: PJ-Comix
>>> she tried to avert his questions
She does that all the time, it is not news.
I am pretty sure she’s an actually talking parrot. All she does is to perfom showing to get money and to spill out strictly written talking points, any deviation from that you can spot her feathers showing through.
23 posted on
04/25/2012 9:33:05 AM PDT by
Sir Napsalot
(Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
To: PJ-Comix
Debbie Washerwoman Schmuckz is channelling her inner Jim Carney.
Badly.
BabblePuss better stick to pre-scripted fake interview softballs on NBC/ABC/CBS/CNN.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson