Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chessplayer

The subtext of these stories, which is almost never challenged, is that if someone uses (or is believed to have used) the only truly taboo word in the language, any level of violence against him and those around him is thereby justified.

I wonder when this notion worked its way into the collective mind?

It’s just a word. Why is its use considered worse than violence in response? Why don’t those offended by a word retaliate with words rather than violence?


8 posted on 04/25/2012 8:52:47 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sherman Logan

Indeed

Remember Omar Thornton?


9 posted on 04/25/2012 8:54:01 AM PDT by Altura Ct.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Sherman Logan

More generally than just that one word,
any sort of “dissing” of a young black man
is justification for at least a beatdown, if not a homicide.

That word is just the pinnacle of “dissing”.


14 posted on 04/25/2012 9:03:10 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson