Not to beat a dead horse, but it occurred to me, correct me if I am wrong in my assumption....Am assuming you do not buy into the junk science about global warming?
Am assuming you do not buy into the junk science of global warming, so why do you in turn buy into the junk science of shaken baby syndrome? Even the “scientist” that was credited with discovering shaken baby syndrome has taken a step back on his original assertions. The entire SBS theory has been discredited, that was what the entirety of the prosecutions case was based on.
Now you support George Zimmerman, as I do, you have probably suggested a rush to judgment on behalf of the media,prosecution same as I have.
Just thought you should not be so quick to condemn Louise Woodward who was convicted on junk science...
No offense intended!!!
I am no expert but I had not heard that shaken baby syndrome has been disproven and it is not easy to crack a human skull as happened with that child. She half confessed saying she had been rough with the child. None of that has anything to do with Zimmerman. Woodward did not get her nose broken by a baby.