Please Keep Free Republic Independent!
Donate, Monthly if you can!
Generous FReeper Sponsors are donating $10 for every New Monthly Donor!
Please Sign Up to Donate Monthly!
Why doesn’t burrax atty just call all the SCOTUS judges ‘RACIST’ and be done with it? That’s how all liberals “win” their arguments when they cannot argue logically.
The regime should’a sent their Great Constitutional Scholar, Hussein to argue b4 SCOTUS today.
This is one of the reasons that I’d just as soon see Obama reelected as Romney.
The court is standing up to Obama. Congress has started standing up to Obama.
Romney will have a free pass from Democrats, RINOS and Establishment Republicans to implement the same agenda as Obama. Obama won’t.
This must REALLY sting Obama and Holder...coming from a Wise Latina and all.
Why is it that Obama keeps losing SCOTUS decisions? Is it the incompetency of those representing his cause, or is it that Obama and his cronies continue to oppose the Constitution of America.
Why is it that Obama keeps losing SCOTUS decisions? Is it the incompetency of those representing his cause, or is it that Obama and his cronies continue to oppose the Constitution of America?
“He moved onto the accountability issues of state officials enforcing federal laws but not being held accountable”
As if somehow federal officials are held to account more than state officials. Ha, ha!
Oh, wait, I get it, they’re not being held accountable by the feds. Because it’s 1865 and states are racist and can’t govern themselves. They need the coolheaded, disinterested, enlightened overseers in Washington to tell when and how to check someone’s citizenship status. Hint: the answer is never.
The SCOTUS argument on ObamaCare demonstrated the feebleness of the federal government’s position. This argument on Arizona’s immigration statute, on the other hand, is more telling of the DOJ’s incompetence. Either way, let’s just hope that their failings prove decisive in both ultimate outcomes.
That was wise of her.
Sotomayer appears more sane and conservative than Mitt’s judicial appointments in Mass... that really says something.
Do you think tomorrow the msm’ers will be calling her a white hispanic?
I only caught this in passing.....if anyone can flesh out any more details, please do.
We know that the Fascist-In-Chief will not care a whit what the Court rules....and his minions are already scurring about to carry out his diktats.
Leni
Leonida Martinez, from Phoenix, Ariz., second from left, and others take part in a demonstration in front of the Supreme Court in Washington, Wednesday, April 25, 2012, as the court questions Arizona’s "show me your papers" immigration law.
Verrilli tried to persuade the justices that they should view the law in its entirety and rule it as inconsistent with federal immigration policy. He said the records check would allow the state to “engage effectively in mass incarceration” of undocumented immigrants.
But Chief Justice John Roberts was among those on the court who took issue with Verrilli’s characterization of the check of immigration status, saying the state merely wants to notify federal authorities it has someone in custody who may be in the U.S. illegally. “It seems to me that the federal government just doesn’t want to know who’s here illegally and who’s not,” Roberts said.
