To: ConservativeStatement
Sorry, putting LOL behind threats to kill someone they personally know and are around all the time, and COULD potentially kill rather easily, does not make it a free speech issue. It makes it a potentially credible threat with a LOL behind it.
If you put it in the above context there is a real potential it could be a genuine threat. And don’t tell me because it’s girls it couldn’t be. Please.
8 posted on
04/26/2012 8:58:31 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
To: Secret Agent Man
Sorry, putting LOL behind threats to kill someone they personally know and are around all the time, and COULD potentially kill rather easily, does not make it a free speech issue. It makes it a potentially credible threat with a LOL behind it. If you put it in the above context there is a real potential it could be a genuine threat. And dont tell me because its girls it couldnt be. Please. Of course, there is taking a look at the whole picture and adding some common sense. It should not have been difficult to discern the difference between 12-14 year olds bantering and a real threat.
23 posted on
04/27/2012 4:10:09 AM PDT by
trebb
("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson