Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gambian President: We would ‘rather eat grass’ than accept homosexual behavior
Right Side News ^ | 4/27/2012 | Christine Dhanagom

Posted on 04/28/2012 5:39:39 AM PDT by IbJensen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-57 last
To: AHerald
“He vowed to make laws regarding homosexuality “stricter than those in Iran.” He wants gays beheaded. Hardly a godly leader.”

Why do you oppose a nation's ability to control it's own social agenda without having the Obama regime dictate to it what they must not do with the homos in their country?

Do you oppose a policy that would make homosexuality a crime and do not think a nation should be able to behead homos?

51 posted on 04/28/2012 10:59:17 AM PDT by Uncle Slayton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
Gambian President: We would ‘rather eat grass’ than accept homosexual behavior

"Eat grass"? Is that some kind of euphemism?

52 posted on 04/28/2012 11:03:47 AM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Sorry, but I’ll take gays over Muzzies. Muzzies are the much bigger threat.


53 posted on 04/28/2012 11:06:59 AM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Your secret is safe with us.


54 posted on 04/28/2012 1:55:35 PM PDT by IbJensen ( I'm supposed to be more angry about what Mitt Romney does with his money than what 0 does with mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

The only secret I have is that Islam is a much greater threat......I supported Pim Fortuyn in the Netherlands, he was gay, but he was on the front lines against Islamo-Fascism, it was a huge loss when he was murdered by the Islamo-Scum.


55 posted on 04/28/2012 3:53:30 PM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: .30Carbine; MarkBsnr
Hello. Where is the “danger” in abhorring homosexuality as God the Creator abhors it?

Homosexuality ought to be shunned everywhere on earth at all times.


God abhors it less than certain other things, according to Jesus, such as stiff-necked pride and an unwillingness to repent and yield to the gospel. Though homosexuality appears in lists of man's sins against God, it is nowhere in Scripture described as the ultimate of sins, neither in kind (it is one mentioned in Leviticus amongst many involving sexual relations with relatives, animals, or menstruating women) nor by penalty. Those who make it so are erecting their own peculiar form of idolatry.

Remember that under the Law, along with homosexual practices (for men, not women), the death penalty was reserved for such things as adultery, witchcraft, cursing one's parents, striking one's parents, a girl lying about her virginity, the daughter of a priest practicing prostitution, being profligate and a drunkard, certain types of perjury, not following the verdict of a judge or a priest, not controlling a dangerous animal that subsequently causes another's death.

Even more weird than the peculiar insistence on insisting on some sins as being particularly heinous while ignoring others that clearly got exactly the same penalty, is this insistence practiced by those of the Calvinist persuasion: if everything is, as Calvin maintained, the outworking of God's secret will by which he ordained the outcome of each human life as well as the least motion of the least of all divinely created creatures before anything ever came to be, then there is no sin whose origin and execution was not merely foreseen but foreordained, set up, set into motion, and guided to completion by God as a horse by its bit is directed here or there by its rider. Given this, the porking of Barney Frank by Herb Moses (or vice versa) is as much a special creation and divine appointment of God as the conception of Jesus by the virgin Mary. One is hard pressed, though, in this particular theological scheme, to see how something could possibly be an abomination to the one who was its direct cause in every sense of the word or how it, or anything else, could be considered a sin in the absence of any agency in the person of the "sinner."
56 posted on 04/28/2012 9:02:41 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Very common view among Africans. America’s liberals are going to have to choose between encouraging Africans and supporting the LGBT agenda.

I’m afraid we will choose badly.


57 posted on 04/28/2012 9:06:39 PM PDT by cookcounty (We need Newt. The Black Belt Jaw-jitsu Master!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson