Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cicero

>”Bush deserves credit for his three appointees, but they are the exceptions rather than the rule.”

Bush appointed only two Supreme Court justices, Roberts and Alito and he had to be dragged against his cronyism into the appointment of Alito.

Bush’s first opportunity to name someone to the Supreme Court came in June 2005. Still thankful and loyal to the Texas Christian Society that formed his inner ring and most loyal supporters for his 1st and 2nd term wins, Bush carefully studied a list of potential picks and dutifully interviewed many on the list while finally settling on Roberts. This is to Bush’s credit.

At the same time that Bush was deliberating on keeping his promise of appointing only “strict constructionists” to the courts, political polls on the situation in Iraq showed plummeting support for the President.

As a disaster was looming in Iraq, before General Petraeus was able to turn the tide, Bush was polling in very low numbers in job approval. Most likely he was disturbed by his increasingly unpopular 2nd term as President and shared with his wife his frustration and fears of a failed presidency. Most likely Laura Bush steered him to distance himself from his conservative base who she identified as the cause of the unpopularity.

Wiki: “First Lady Laura Bush announced in an interview during an official visit to Africa a preference for her husband to nominate a woman to O’Connor’s seat. Bush was surprised at his wife’s public comments on the Supreme Court, but said he would be open to hearing her advice when she returned from her trip.”

Laura Bush went on to announce publicly two additional times that she wanted a woman nominated.

The result of Bush’s deliberations was the announcement of Harriet Miers, a liberal leaning crony of Laura Bush’s with thin credentials. Only the vociferous opposition of Senate conservatives caused Miers to withdraw her nomination.

Fred Thompson stepped in to guide President Bush to Alito. Both of Roberts and Alito have saved a great deal of the heritage of the Framer’s Constitutional intent.

In sum, it was not Bush’s hand that led to Alito, it was direct confrontation with Senate conservatives and conservative members of his inner ring that reminded him of the people that had worked so hard to elect him.

Had Bush succeeded in appointing Harriet Miers, many of the recent Supreme Court decisions would have gone to the Left.


69 posted on 05/01/2012 7:07:49 PM PDT by Hostage (Be Breitbart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Hostage

Well, yes, the Harriet Miers fiasco would have been a disaster, if Bush had succeeded. It was indeed another case of cronyism, and as you suggest Laura Bush pushed it very, very hard.

We fought it hard here in FR. Thank God it failed, and Bush reconsidered.

I was also thinking of Clarence Thomas, but that was the first Bush—after the Souter disaster.


73 posted on 05/01/2012 7:37:49 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson