Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Bill Proposes To Extend Wind Energy PTC, Slash Oil Subsidies
nawindpower.com ^ | 1 May 2012 | Laura DiMungo

Posted on 05/01/2012 10:21:24 PM PDT by smokingfrog

A group of Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives has introduced new legislation that would extend a number of incentives for wind power and other forms of renewable energy while stripping subsidies for fossil fuels.

The bill - Investing to Modernize the Production of American Clean Energy and Technology (IMPACT Act) - introduced by Reps. Ed Markey, D-Mass.; Henry Waxman, D-Calif.; John Larson, D-Conn.; Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore.; and Bill Pascrell Jr.; D-N.J. - proposes an eight-year extension to the production tax credit (PTC) for wind, solar, geothermal, biomass, landfill gas, hydropower, and marine and hydrokinetic power production.

Notably, however, the bill specifies that if a renewable electricity standard or similar measure - such as the clean energy standard proposed most recently by Sen. Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M. - were to become law, the PTC would be phased out within 12 months.

The legislation also would renew the Section 1603 renewable energy cash-grant program - which expired at the end of last year - for another two years.

Among the provisions of the bill is a specific carve-out for offshore wind energy. Under the legislation, the first 3 GW of offshore wind power projects would be eligible for a 30% investment tax credit.

The IMPACT Act is not only pro-renewables, but also pro-manufacturing, as it provides for $5 billion in tax credits under the Section 48C program for the construction of new and modified clean energy technologies.

The bill also contains provisions to extend tax credits for energy-efficient appliances, electric vehicles and natural-gas trucks, as well as to encourage the development of more pumping and charging stations for alternative-fuel and electric vehicles.

(Excerpt) Read more at nawindpower.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bigoil; greenjobs; taxbreaks

1 posted on 05/01/2012 10:21:28 PM PDT by smokingfrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: steelyourfaith

Ping.


2 posted on 05/01/2012 10:24:23 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Socialist idiots.


3 posted on 05/01/2012 10:30:05 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is on!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Hate to disagree, jim, but nope.

Corrupt marxist scum looking to line their and their buddies’ pockets with taxpayer money. And score political points with their brain-dead base while doing it...


4 posted on 05/01/2012 10:40:00 PM PDT by piytar (The predator-class is furious that their prey are shooting back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Oregon Ping....Earl Blumenauer is supporting this....


5 posted on 05/01/2012 10:42:08 PM PDT by goodnesswins (2012..."We mutually pledge our Lives, our Fortunes, and our Sacred Honor")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piytar

Corrupt marxist scum looking to line their and their buddies’ pockets with taxpayer money. And score political points with their brain-dead base while doing it...


BINGO!!!!!!

You nailed it perfectly.


6 posted on 05/01/2012 10:44:16 PM PDT by unkus (Silence Is Consent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

No one seems to be paying attention to the fact that these alternative technologies are not working out very well. Yet they won’t support atomic energy which is the only one that does. Very few supporters of “green”solutions seems to have the most basic understanding of science. They can’t appreciate that a thimbleful of gasoline can move a 3000 lb car about a mile, that we are still not at the end of the development of the internal combusion engine. In theory, we might design sailing ships that would travel much faster than those of the 19th century, and predict the winds with much great accuracy, but we run up against the limits to improvement that caused. them to be replaced in the first place. Ditto the airships which we once thought would dominate the skies.


7 posted on 05/01/2012 11:02:21 PM PDT by RobbyS (Christus rex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

All I picture in my mind is Mad Max the movie


8 posted on 05/01/2012 11:08:30 PM PDT by funfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
But Wind Farms add to Global Warming. What's a Dummycrat to do?

http://news.discovery.com/earth/hot-wind-farms-120429.html
http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2012/04/30/wind-farms-cause-global-warming/

9 posted on 05/01/2012 11:50:37 PM PDT by Chgogal (WSJ, Coulter, Kristol, Krauthammer, Rove et al., STFU. Thank you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
Boehner needs to treat this bill like Pelosi treated Pub sponsored bills - ignore them.
10 posted on 05/02/2012 3:23:37 AM PDT by Mister Da (The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

These are all major boondoggles meant to pay off political supporters. Instead of spending $5b on alternative energy subsidies, they ought to offer a large cash prize (e.g. $1b in each category) to the first person/corporation that invents any alternative energy technology that is competitive with various fossil fuels at some benchmark price - say $30 a barrel for oil, and so on for other fossil fuels. If the technologies materialize, the boost to the nation’s economy, and the consequent tax revenue increases, will more than pay for the prizes. If they don’t, the prize money remains in the nation’s Treasury.


11 posted on 05/02/2012 4:55:41 AM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

Low, stable tax rates generate jobs and economic growth. This idea has been the bedrock of conservative economic ideology for decades. One industry that represents this essential conservative principle is U.S. wind energy.
Low taxes in the form of the federal Production Tax Credit for wind have driven as much as $20 billion of private investment a year into the U.S. economy. Wind power is now one of America’s biggest sources of new electricity and fastest growing manufacturing sectors. It has accounted for more than a third of all new U.S. electric generation in recent years.Conservatives can and do support wind.
REP. STEVE KING | 2/16/12

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0212/72954.html#ixzz1uIDqT2kH

Wind is a CONSERVATIVE principle ??! WHO KNEW?


12 posted on 05/08/2012 11:41:21 AM PDT by TurboZamboni (Looting the future to bribe the present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson