Replies

You have pre-judged me, sir.
I judged you by your actions. Since you so rarely engage in conversation that's all I have to go by.

You have no idea what agony I personally experienced between your first comment and my response.
Any discomfiture you might, or might not, have experienced isn't my concern. It sure didn't stop you from continuing to post your recommendations for the bill despite being told it was BS.

I can not, would not, dispute Herb Titus.
Yet you did just that by urging others to support the bill. You apparently did no research on it whatsoever after that first reply of mine, nor did I see then you asking why it was a bad bill. Instead you chose to continue to post it anyway.

However Bret Baier’s comments have aroused controversy in regard to Obama’s eligibility. This is a GOOD thing.
All Bret's comments did was show that he's just another talking head who parroted what he had been told. He used Byron York of the Washington Examiner as his only source.
The controversy was already aroused. It got aroused in his direction and he obviously was disconcerted by it.

Bret explains "natural born citizen" requirements for president and vice president

I noted in the blog- there is a lot of dispute about the legal term and what the Founding Fathers truly meant. What I did not put in the blog -was that a large part of this was originally reported by Byron York of the Washington Examiner. I asked him to send me his reporting a few weeks ago - and I should have cited that in the blog this morning... I apologize to Byron for leaving that out. Bottom line... this is obviously getting a lot of attention.. so, we think we should do a full piece on the show about it.. and maybe have a panel of constitutional scholars... and legal experts to discuss this.

His was one of the most pronounced backpedals I've ever witnessed. If such a piece happens the guest speakers will be most telling.