For for the same reasons they didn't vote for him in all his other runs. Truly he is not a stable minded man...and now certainly beyond the will to be President as he has stated. He simply wants to go out with his voice heard...and said as much to that affect. We already have a President who doesn't want his job....why put another one in office who doesn't.
Further he'd have no chance against Obama at all....Romney's going to have his hands full as well.
What has he said that makes you believe he's unstable?
. . . now certainly beyond the will to be President as he has stated. He simply wants to go out with his voice heard...and said as much to that affect.
Here is the interview from ABC. If one ignores the lead in, and reads just what Dr. Paul said, one must admit that he seems rather hopeful, if not convinced.
"An amazing admission tonight from Ron Paul.
In an exclusive interview, I asked him: “When you lay your head on your pillow at night, do you see yourself in the Oval Office?”
“Not really,” he said.
He went on to say that he’s not blind to the odds, but they are “not as slim as they were 25 years ago.”
There are many ways to interpret this interview. Of course the LSM is bound to see it the way that best presents their agenda.
Further he'd have no chance against Obama at all....Romney's going to have his hands full as well.
According to polls I've seen, Paul does at least four or five points better than Romney against BO, and his appeal is to a much wider electorate.
More from the ABC interview: "I also asked if he though (sic) he was too old to be president. He’d be 81 at the end of his first term.
He said, “Freedom is a youthful idea,” his health is good, and he challenges any of his rivals to a physical fitness test.
He also jokingly accused me of ageism.
“Be careful,” he said. “There are laws against that.”
One other thing, wouldn't you trust Paul to nominate constitutionalists to the Supreme Court as opposed to Romney? I still don't understand why a Freeper would even contemplate a vote for Romney and not consider voting for Paul in the primary if he has a primary vote. I just don't get it. Why are we giving in to Romney before the final primary?