Replies

You’re not listening to the reasons people are giving you why Ron Paul isn’t supported.

I've read what's been given. I just believe that "reason" must be based in fact or reality. Simply because one says something or "believes" something to be true, doesn't mean it is true. There's only one poster I have not responded to with sound argument. And his post is very long and very involved. I don't have the mental energy at this time to respond to it, but I "heard" the reasons.

Also, I'm not questioning "why Paul isn't supported"; I'm asking why Romney and not Paul. No one has given me a solid answer in response to that question.

as many Paul supporters you’re in denial.

I'm a Palin supporter. Questioning is not the same as denying.

Further he’s been protecting Romney’s flank from day one.

Can you give me specific actions or even words that Ron Paul has made (at least three examples) that would make this a valid statement?

I'm asking why Romney and not Paul. No one has given me a solid answer in response to that question.

Because Ron Paul is a freakin' kook-wad and Romney at least pretends to be a sane human being.

Granted, Romney is a gun-grabbing socialist douchebag but he doesn't have aliens and troofers among his supporters.

It's a matter of degree.

And Ron Paul is many degrees out-of-level.

I'm not in Romney's court but opposing both he and Obama so I cannot help you understand people's who would secure Romney over PAul....they did the same thing with Newt when he was still running.....basically their vote was a vote against Newt...and Paul.

Many swallowed the Santorum bait...and it worked. But as projected until he hit the wall in PA....but then he knew he would and so did the GOP.

Paul just isn't in this to win...and his desires are to be heard ...and speaking his mind.

If it were to go to converntion Paul will release his delegates to Romney....he's there to protect him.