Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TransCanada takes another crack at Keystone XL Pipeline with New Route (back at ya, Obama)
National Post.com ^ | Friday, May 4, 2012 | Sheldon Alberts

Posted on 05/04/2012 1:08:55 PM PDT by canuck_conservative

WASHINGTON — TransCanada Corp. on Friday reapplied to the U.S. State Department for a presidential permit to build the controversial Keystone XL oilsands pipeline, immediately triggering a new fight with opponents over the scope of a coming environmental impact study into the project.

In an interview with Postmedia News, TransCanada executive Alex Pourbaix said the Calgary-based company expects the Obama administration’s review of Keystone XL to be limited to the new rerouted portion of the pipeline through Nebraska.

“Certainly our expectation is that the only required new review would be on the actual reroute itself . . . What we are talking, in the scheme of things, (is) a relatively modest reroute,” said Pourbaix, president of TransCanada’s pipeline division.

“As we look at it, we don’t see anything material that was not reviewed in the original application, other than the specific reroute in Nebraska.”

TransCanada submitted its new application for a presidential permit just two weeks after it proposed several new routes for Keystone XL that avoid the ecologically fragile Sand Hills region of Nebraska....

Because the $5.3-billion pipeline’s planned U.S. route remains unchanged through Montana and South Dakota — which already approved Keystone XL — no new environmental study needs to be done there, TransCanada says.

The company has split the original southern portion of the pipeline — from Steele City, Nebraska, to Port Arthur, Texas — into a separate project that does not require new approval and already has Obama’s support.

But U.S. green groups are already raising objections to TransCanada’s push for a limited review of the pipeline. They argue that the earlier State Department study was flawed because it was conducted by a third-party contractor who had worked with TransCanada in the past.....

(Excerpt) Read more at business.financialpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ecothreats; keystone; obamastalling; pipeline
What stalling excuse will it be this time??
1 posted on 05/04/2012 1:09:05 PM PDT by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative

What stalling excuse will it be this time??


Lady Bugs


2 posted on 05/04/2012 1:13:22 PM PDT by unkus (Silence Is Consent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative

North Dakota Brakken Strata contains more oil then Saudi Arabia. Why aren’t we tapping these reserves.


3 posted on 05/04/2012 1:15:13 PM PDT by Young Werther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Young Werther
North Dakota Brakken Strata contains more oil then Saudi Arabia. Why aren’t we tapping these reserves.

I believe we are, which is why there is so much work to be had in North Dakota. These things take time, and the Canadians have a seven year or so head start on us. Also keep in mind tat there's oil etc. to be had, but it doesn't come out of the ground as cheaply or easily as the Saudi stuff.
4 posted on 05/04/2012 1:21:29 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

I just laughed every time they said “Evironmentaly sensitive Nebraska”...like hahahahahahahaha. In the event of a spill, how much oil would dump on the ground anyway? And in the flattest part of the country, where would it go? Can’t they isolate sections of pipe, anyway? So are they worried a few thousand gallons of oil would permanently make a black spot on the soil that would despoil the view from 35 kilofeet permanently?


5 posted on 05/04/2012 1:29:29 PM PDT by dsrtsage (One half of all people have below average IQ. In the US the number is 54%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative
Good move by TransCanada. ObaMao doesn't want the pipeline for two reasons:
  1. His sugar Daddy Warren Buffet is making megabucks transporting oil by railroad.
  2. The environmental lobby wants to delay putting domestic and friendly Canadian oil on the market as long as possible both as a means to placate their OPEC paymasters and promote their pie in the sky green energy projects.

My prediction: ObaMao cannot come up with another quick environmental excuse this time, no matter how flimsy, so they will just demand a new environmental study which they can drag out until the November election.

6 posted on 05/04/2012 1:34:42 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dsrtsage
“Environmentally sensitive Nebraska”

Actually, Nebraska is a key environmental state in terms of water supply to much of the west due to the Ogallala Aquifer and the Platte and North Platte drainage basins, which are major tributaries of the Missouri River.

It is also nowhere near the flattest state in the union. North Dakota and Kansas both have it beat in that category.

That being said, even a major pipeline blowout could be contained within a matter of hours with minimal environmental impact.

There has not been a major break in the Alaska pipeline (which is far less accessible) with technology from the 1970's used to construct it.

The engineers who design these things generally know a hell of a lot more than the government bureaucrats who regulate them.

7 posted on 05/04/2012 1:47:22 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative

“”TransCanada Corp. on Friday reapplied to the U.S. State Department for a presidential permit”””

Why don’t they just call it what it is, a DICTATOR permit.


8 posted on 05/04/2012 1:47:36 PM PDT by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative

Maybe Canada should wait until Jan/2013 to ask again.


9 posted on 05/04/2012 2:03:10 PM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

You could make a case for ANY State being ‘environmentally sensitive’. It’s like ‘climate change’. It’s always true and it happens everywhere.


10 posted on 05/04/2012 2:25:15 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana
but it doesn't come out of the ground as cheaply or easily as the Saudi stuff.

Maybe so, but it costs the same on the open (spelled cartel) market.

11 posted on 05/04/2012 3:00:44 PM PDT by itsahoot (I will not vote for Romney period, and by election day you won't like him either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative
It isn't like this is some new thing. There are pipelines all over the place now.

Pipeline 101

12 posted on 05/04/2012 5:02:39 PM PDT by bigheadfred (MY PET TAPEWORM (OBIWAN) IS AN INSANE MILITARY HATING LEFTIST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative

“In an interview with Postmedia News, TransCanada executive Alex Pourbaix said the Calgary-based company expects the Obama administration’s review of Keystone XL to be limited to the new rerouted portion of the pipeline through Nebraska.”

He don’t know Barry very well.


13 posted on 05/05/2012 9:28:41 AM PDT by headstamp 2 (Liberalism: Carrying adolescent values and behavior into adult life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative

That he’s a communist idiot that gets support from conservatives now....


14 posted on 05/05/2012 3:07:27 PM PDT by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dsrtsage
There are pipelines through Nebraska now and the Keystone project would be perfectly safe due to the geology of this "fragile" region. The "environmental issue" is a pure fabrication by the left.

Whats more, everyone involved knows it.

15 posted on 05/05/2012 6:02:46 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

http://journalstar.com/news/opinion/editorial/columnists/local-view-a-science-based-approach-to-the-ogallala-aquifer/article_40586032-0597-5375-815a-8f91284a5fbf.html


16 posted on 05/05/2012 6:16:30 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Young Werther

We are......but right now Obama’s crony W.Buffet is making bugo-bucks shipping oil with his BN railroad line....

big reason why Obama is delaying the pipeline as long as he can.

Problem is with WTCrude around 100.00——Bakken Oil Co are only getting 70 plus or minus, due to the cost of shipping via truck and then rail.....


17 posted on 05/06/2012 9:56:28 AM PDT by sbark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson