[GeorgeWashingtonsGhost]

Maybe they’re getting away with something because no one can friggin’ understand what this means!

[eartick]

Exactly, all I can do is chamber another round and smack a pumpkin at 800 meters

[No Socialist]

“Maybe they’re getting away with something because no one can friggin’ understand what this means!”

Whew! I thought it was just me!

[homegroan]

The problem with this story is the words...there are just too many of them!

Is there a Cliff Note version of it....or maybe it can be served up in a nutshell?

I’d even settle for courtroom reporter etchings-might make more sense with pictures....

;)

[GladesGuru]

“Maybe they’re getting away with something because no one can friggin’ understand what this means!”

The Defendant was reduced to the status of mere chattel property.

Let’s look at the logic of this situation
1. A slave was once chattel property under US law.
2. The judge reduced the this Defendant to chattel property.
3. Therefore, the judge made a de facto slave of the Defendant.

SLAVERY IS BACK! - DA’ JUDGE SEZ SO! ! ! !

Clear, isn’t it?

AND made the Defendant the de facto property of the Receiver.