” So who is doing the attacking? “
That’s not readily apparent from the article - but farther down, deeper in the piece, there’s a few tidbits of ‘interesting’ information..
(Which I’d love to post here, but not wanting to run afoul of the Excerpting Guidelines - any guidance here, Mod??)
I’d go a bit farther in the “alarm” direcion.... the article states some startling things. For example, apparent directives to NOT do anything about the initial breaches. It appears to insinuate that the warners are somehow connected to the culprits.