So, Kellogg’s is responsible for Stewart’s blabber? They want to boycott their product simply because they advertise on a highly watched show? That’s like making someone take down their billboard along a road that has a whorehouse on it. There is no difference.
“So, Kellogg’s is responsible for Stewart’s blabber?”
Did I say that? Their choice to continue advertising in light of Stewart’s bigotry speaks volumes. In light of their decisions to pull advertising for other controversial issues, the fact that they choose to remain with Stewart is indicative of the mindset of Kellogg ad execs.
Do you not see that?
The analogy you provided makes no sense at all.