“Heh. No it wasn’t to “disparage Christians”. I am a Christian, genius.”
Yea well, sure...if you say so. Why the problem defending your faith then?
It is true that someone taking offense does not constitute hate speech. Your problem is you think the rot coming from Stewart isn’t hate speech because he hasn’t called for the Christians to be thrown to the lions.
“I won’t join a crusade to require people to bow at the alter of the non-offensive.
A crusade now, is it? Bow at the altar, (fixed it for you), of the non-offensive?
Get a grip.
“Today, we silence John Stewart for being offensive. Tomorrow, the gay lobby silences us for the same reason.”
Again with the gay thing. Stay on point...we’re talking about Jon Stewart, not the gay lobby. There’s a difference between silencing and accountability.
You will never “get it.”
You probably don’t know when to come in out of the rain either.
I have no problem defending my faith. Stewart was wrong. Stewart is a jackass. I didn’t watch him ... but, if I could’ve, I’d have shut off the show. I’d still buy Kellogg’s cereal, though.
It still wasn’t “hate speech”.
The “gay thing” is on point. I’m talking about over-sensitive people labeling offensive speech “hate speech” as an attempt to silence it.
I come in out of the rain when the job is done.
SnakeDoc