Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP House hits back at Obama gay marriage statement
http://www.americanthinker.com/ ^ | May 10, 2012 | Rick Moran

Posted on 05/10/2012 8:46:18 AM PDT by BO Stinkss

Just hours after President Barack Obama publicly backed gay marriage, the House struck back and passed a measure aimed at reinforcing the Defense of Marriage Act.

With a 245-171 vote, the House voted to stop the Justice Department from using taxpayer funds to actively oppose DOMA -- the Clinton-era law defining marriage as between a man and a woman that the Obama administration stopped enforcing in February 2011.

"It is not President Obama's prerogative to decide which laws matter and which do not, nor his right to challenge constitutional amendments duly passed by the various states," said the measure's sponsor, Rep. Tim Huelskamp (R-Kan.). "The Justice Department is duty-bound to enforce DOMA and to not do so is a flagrant disregard for the Constitution and for the rule of law."

Huelskamp's amendment was attached to a $51.1 billion spending bill that would fund DOJ and the Commerce Department, and major science agencies. Sixteen Democrats voted with the GOP for the amendment, while seven Republicans opposed it.

Democrats immediately attacked Republicans for the vote. The issue of gay marriage has been brought to the fore by Obama to distract America from his horrible economic record. In this respect, the GOP is playing right into his hands. Obama has energized his base by re-stating his 1996 position in support of gay marriage, while solidifying his hold on an important Democratic party constituency whose influence far exceeds its numbers.

But hasn't he energzied gay marriage opponents too? Yes, but the issue is a wedge mostly in states he doesn't have a chance of winning anyway. In some important swing states - New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Virginia, and Florida - he may have bought himself more votes than he will lose. That might matter a lot if, as expected, those states, and...

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: gay; gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; kenyanbornmuzzie; obama; sourcetitlenoturl; swrdswllwngsdshw
In other news: Obama ate dog. When will the GOP stop taking the bait? Obama want's the topic to be anything but Obamanomics and Obamacare.
1 posted on 05/10/2012 8:46:27 AM PDT by BO Stinkss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BO Stinkss
Finally the GOP finding some sort of testicular fortitude to stand up for the rule of law.
2 posted on 05/10/2012 8:49:33 AM PDT by THE_RAIDER (I'm supposed to be more angry about what Romney does with his money than what Obama does with mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BO Stinkss

“It is not President Obama’s prerogative to decide which laws matter and which do not, nor his right to challenge constitutional amendments duly passed by the various states,”

On the CONTRARY, Obama is Messiah, he can do anything he wants.
Just ask almost anyone in our 50%+ gay mainstream media.


3 posted on 05/10/2012 8:50:34 AM PDT by tcrlaf (Election 2012: THE RAPTURE OF THE DEMOCRATS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BO Stinkss
you can bet, they'll hit 'em w/ a feather bola.

4 posted on 05/10/2012 9:09:18 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (WA. DC E$tabli$hment; DNC/RNC/Unionists...old Brazilian saying: "$@me $hit; different flie$". :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BO Stinkss

“Democrats immediately attacked Republicans for the vote. The issue of gay marriage has been brought to the fore by Obama to distract America from his horrible economic record. In this respect, the GOP is playing right into his hands.”

If the GOP hadn’t “taken the bait”, what would many be saying about them? “No spine”?, “no guts”?, “the stupid party”?, and other abuses.


5 posted on 05/10/2012 9:10:18 AM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BO Stinkss

What role should government have in Marriage? Why do I need permission from government? Why do they make me buy a marriage license?

Just wondering.

I’m not gay, not religious. It just seems to be another “chumming” of the waters by the politicians to whip each side into a frenzy. I’m sick of politicians. I’m sick of over reaching government. I’m sick of government that thinks it has a say in every corner and niche of our lives.

The fight is all over government goodies the attempt to redefine marriage. SS = government, Tax benefits = government.


6 posted on 05/10/2012 9:17:49 AM PDT by listenhillary (Courts, law enforcement, roads and national defense should be the extent of government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: THE_RAIDER

it’s sad when i have to check to see if this is a john semmes sacasm piece


7 posted on 05/10/2012 9:24:27 AM PDT by bravo whiskey (If the little things really bother you, maybe it's because the big things are going well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BO Stinkss

8 posted on 05/10/2012 10:11:38 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary

Well then, why should there be government at all by your statement? It reads like an advocacy for anarchy.

Marriage records are primarily administered by local governments to assure continuity of societal structures which ultimately give legitimacy to children’s patrilineal and matrilineal lines. How strongly maintained these are is a matter for the individuals involved which it seems to me is the real issue. Yet society, it also appears to me, would quickly break down without the authority endorsed by such organization as one can clearly see by simply looking at the majority of criminality regularly detailed in daily news accounts.

I’m sick too of the overreach of government, but that is really a separate issue.


9 posted on 05/10/2012 10:26:42 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: onedoug

So were all going to die of anarchy if government doesn’t record our births, marriages and death?


10 posted on 05/10/2012 10:37:12 AM PDT by listenhillary (Courts, law enforcement, roads and national defense should be the extent of government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary

IMHO it definitely increases the odds.

I believe in what I wrote.

Best....


11 posted on 05/10/2012 11:14:44 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

says it all


12 posted on 05/10/2012 4:33:11 PM PDT by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson