Another thread had a story about how some radicals, angry that North Carolina had the audacity to define marriage in the traditional manner, wanted to pull the convention in protest of that fact.
But, then, where can they move the convention to?
Considering that 32 other states have also amended their constitutions to define marriage, and another dozen or so states define marriage in their regular family laws, there are very few places in America where they could have the convention.
If you have to boycott North Carolina over marriage, then you also have to boycott the vast majority of the country, to be intellectually honest about the subject.
Even liberal California had the audacity to define marriage as a man and a woman. Liberals have to boycott California don’t they?
Liberals don’t have to be consistent...they’re LIBERALS.
In CA, the Libs got what they wanted through the courts.
So however it happens, if the bottom line is the state supports gay marriage, that would be a fine candidate for the convention, by LIB reasoning.
NY now has gay marriage and several other states. All these states either got it through courts or through legislative votes, not through a people’s referendum.
My point is I don’t think LIBS care what entity provides for it, as long as a state is in the gay marriage column.
So there are several places they can move it to, by their LIB standards.
It can go to where the Demonrat delegates will most likely end up.