Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N.D. tops Alaska on oil
Jamestown Sun ^ | May 15, 2012 | Stephen J. Lee

Posted on 05/15/2012 6:43:26 AM PDT by thackney

North Dakota passed Alaska in March to become the second-leading state in crude oil production, trailing only Texas, according to preliminary figures released Monday.

North Dakota produced an average of 575,490 barrels of crude oil every day in March, another record, according to Lynn Helms, director of the state’s Department of Mineral Resources. The crude is coming from a record 6,636 wells. In February, the state produced 558,255 barrels and had 6,450 wells.

The number of rigs drilling in the state was at 208 on Monday, about where it has been for eight months, including a record 212 drilling for a day or two earlier this month.

North Dakota’s new record output of crude surpassed the steadily declining output of Alaska, which saw its production fall to 567,481 barrels per day in March, down nearly 15,000 barrels per day from February, said Stephen McMains of the state’s Oil and Gas Conservation Commission on Monday.

Meanwhile, Texas’ production has been rising steadily by 12 percent since September, to 1.72 million barrels per day in February, the latest figures available from the U.S. Energy Information Administration, which tracks state and federal crude oil production. Meg Coleman, a geologist with the EIA, said preliminary figures make it appear Texas’ production increased in March.

Fueled by the Bakken boom in the Williston Basin in the western part of the state, North Dakota’s oil production has nearly quadrupled since March 2007, when it averaged 118,103 barrels per day.

In December, North Dakota’s crude production eclipsed California for the third ranking. California produced 540,000 barrels a day in February, and it will remain about the same when March figures are released later this month, said Gordon Schremp of the state’s energy commission.

Helms said in an email to the Herald on Monday evening that North Dakota’s figures will be released in full Tuesday, showing March output was right in line with the average monthly increase the past year in daily production of 16,500 barrels. Natural gas production also is at record levels.

But he expects production in April and May may have slowed as weight restrictions imposed on thawing roads slowed down water hauling, which is key for the hydraulic fracturing crews who work on the newly drilled wells to get the oil flowing in the “tight” Bakken and Three Forks formations.

The top four producing states accounted for 55 percent of the nation’s total crude output in February of 6.144 million barrels a day, according to EIA.

Ron Ness, president of the North Dakota Petroleum Council, said he was surprised when told Monday that Alaska’s trend downward already appeared to have dipped below North Dakota’s five-year ascending production.

“Holy cow, I didn’t think it would happen this fast,” he said.

The warm, dry winter in North Dakota was a big contrast to the snowy, cold months Alaska experienced, Ness pointed out.

Alaska has seen decreasing production for decades, since pumping out more than 2 million barrels a day in the 1970s.

The rig count in North Dakota has remained relatively constant for the past eight months or more, Ness said, at 204 to 209 most of the time, including a record high this month of 212 for a day or two.

“I think we are seeing more of a transition from exploration into more of a development phase,” Ness said Monday. “I think we are settled in here where companies are really concentrating on efficiency and running drilling rigs off the pads, so you will see the rig count appears to be stabilized.

“We have seen a lot of companies coming in with new technologies . . . coming in from all over the world,” Ness said.

TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Alaska; US: North Dakota
KEYWORDS: bakken; energy; oil

1 posted on 05/15/2012 6:43:29 AM PDT by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

North Dakota Field Production of Crude Oil

Alaska Field Production of Crude Oil

2 posted on 05/15/2012 6:50:01 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
And note: this is on PRIVATE land.

I say again, PRIVATE land.

This is why the federal government wants to keep millions of square miles of western land locked up. They KNOW those states would become rich and powerful from the minerals under those lands. And those states would tell the federal government to piss up a rope when it comes to silly environmental regulations.

3 posted on 05/15/2012 7:09:09 AM PDT by backwoods-engineer (I will vote against ANY presidential candidate who had non-citizen parents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

wasn’t Ted Turner buying up the whole state awhile back? I am guessing he must of got advance notice of what was coming with regard to this oil shale boom.

4 posted on 05/15/2012 7:14:25 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama lied .. and the economy died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

And too many Alaskans, even so called conservatives, still are trying to rape the oil companies here in Alaska. What a crying shame!

5 posted on 05/15/2012 7:27:24 AM PDT by vpintheak (Occupy your Brain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vpintheak

I believe they are going to learn in the not so distant future, what it is like to pay more of your own taxes, Many just believe the golden goose will lay more eggs if you just squeeze it hard enough.

Far too many believe the oil companies have no choice. They ignore what is going on in other locations. There are several good choices for their investment dollars.

6 posted on 05/15/2012 7:42:36 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: thackney

I have read another article that said Tesoro is buying a whole bunch of rail cars to buy oil from North Dakota and they are scaling back operations in Alaska. Nice. And the people here are whining about their PFD. It is sickening what the lure of money does to people.

7 posted on 05/15/2012 9:10:15 AM PDT by vpintheak (Occupy your Brain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

I think Ted was buying up Montana, not North Dakota

8 posted on 05/15/2012 10:18:02 AM PDT by Maine Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Sad though. Alaska would be cleaning ND’s clock (and maybe Texas too) if ANWR was open for business. The pipeline is running at, maybe, 30% capacity, and there is a boatload of oil up there.

9 posted on 05/15/2012 3:35:25 PM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL

The optimistic projects of ANWR would add a million barrels a day at its peak. It would jump back ahead of ND, assuming ND doesn’t stay on the fast climbing rise. But another million would still leave you behind Texas, and we are climbing faster than ND.

Texas added about half million a day in the last year. In the same time, ND added just over 200k.

10 posted on 05/15/2012 3:47:16 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: thackney

That’s pretty AWESOME, thanks for the numbers. Maybe our taxes won’t have to skyrocket then...

11 posted on 05/15/2012 6:56:18 PM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson