Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin
Yeah -- not because the breast-feeding mom is allowing herself to be treated like a vending machine by a child perfectly capable of getting the same nutrition from a source much more convenient for the mother.

Some idiot posted a few days ago that breast-feeding kids as old as toddlers, old enough to talk, was "the way humans lived up until the last 100 years or so." Yeah -- right! As if in the Pioneer American West or a middle-class 18th century European city or town, any toddler who ran up to his/her mom while she was busy working or perhaps socializing, and yanked down her shirt to nurse, would be tolerated.

And food for thought: what kind of response do you suppose we'd be seeing if instead of a three-year-old boy at the teat, it was a three-year-old girl? Hmmmmmmmmmmm?

9 posted on 05/15/2012 1:26:23 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent * By the way, Ted, voting for Romney is voting stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Finny

Oh, kids were breastfed as toddlers in the 19th, early 20th century. Read some fiction like a “Tree Grows in Brooklyn” which has a classic chapter on a little brat who refuses to be weaned.

A lot of the breastfeeding had to do with not becoming pregnant.

And I’ll never forget Zelda Fitzgerald’s remark that she was breastfed until “she could chew sticks.” That would have been around 1905.

I hate this photo. It is in very bad taste and will cause that dumb kid a life of heartache.


11 posted on 05/15/2012 1:35:45 PM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson