Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

debt collectors reap huge salaries chasing student loans
Minneapolis / St. Paul Business Journal ^ | 5-15-12 | Mark Reilly

Posted on 05/15/2012 8:08:54 PM PDT by TurboZamboni

Minnesota nonprofit that's on the front lines of a growing debate over student-loan debt.

Bloomberg Businessweek profiles Educational Credit Management Corp., one of the 32 “guaranty agencies" that oversee student loans for the U.S. Department of Education and try to recover money.

Its bill collectors can be highly rewarded. ECMC's top collector took home $454,000 in just one year, twice as much as the U.S. secretary of education. The CEO of the group made $1.1 million in 2010. The company moved from downtown St. Paul to Oakdale a few years ago.

(Excerpt) Read more at bizjournals.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: collectors; college; debt; loan; loans; spending; tuition
evil debt collectors!
1 posted on 05/15/2012 8:09:05 PM PDT by TurboZamboni
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni
Private debt collectors are easy to dodge. When the lending institution decides the debt is noncollectable, then issues you a 1099C for the “forgiven debt”, that's when the debt collector from hell grabs you by the short and curlies. The IRS considers “forgiven debt” as income and will come after you like a tiger for taxes due on that income.
2 posted on 05/15/2012 8:36:13 PM PDT by shove_it (just undo it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

“But I thought that was, like, free money, man! “/s;)


3 posted on 05/15/2012 8:38:24 PM PDT by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

“When the lending institution decides the debt is noncollectable, then issues you a 1099C for the “forgiven debt”

Pardon my iggernunce, but why would they do that? I thought they reported such things to the evil credit rating agencies to ruin your credit.


4 posted on 05/16/2012 12:31:48 AM PDT by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dsc

When the debt collectors are unable to collect the debt, the lending institution writes it off as a business expense then issues you the 1099C, copy to IRS. That’s when your troubles REALLY begin.


5 posted on 05/16/2012 3:42:05 AM PDT by shove_it (just undo it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

Between 1993 and 2007, the number of full-time administrators per 100 students at America’s leading universities grew by 39 percent, while the number of employees engaged in teaching, research or service only grew by 18 percent. Inflation-adjusted spending on administration per student increased by 61 percent during the same period, while instructional spending per student rose 39 percent. Arizona State University, for example, increased the number of administrators per 100 students by 94 percent during this period while actually reducing the number of employees engaged in instruction, research and service by 2 percent. Nearly half of all full-time employees at Arizona State University are administrators
A significant reason for the administrative bloat is that students pay only a small portion of administrative costs. The lion’s share of university resources comes from the federal and state governments, as well as private gifts and fees for non-educational services. The large and increasing rate of government subsidy for higher education facilitates administrative bloat by insulating students from the costs. Reducing government subsidies would do much to make universities more efficient.

For public universities the administrative bloat is much worse than at private colleges - administrative positions grew by 39% between 1993 and 2007, almost four times the 9.8% increase for instructional positions. At private universities, without access to the public largess, administrative and instructional positions increased at about the same rate.

And we wonder why college costs too much...


6 posted on 05/16/2012 7:52:27 AM PDT by TurboZamboni (Looting the future to bribe the present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

“F U, Pay Me!” - Goodfellas


7 posted on 05/16/2012 7:53:06 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni
"...the number of full-time administrators per 100 students at America’s leading universities grew by 39 percent ..."

Agreed, administrators are the scourge of government and business alike. Does top management even keep an eye on the ratio of indirect to direct labor any more?

p.s. I like your handle there TZ, you must be a hockey fan

8 posted on 05/16/2012 8:09:11 AM PDT by shove_it (just undo it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: shove_it
"The most fundamental fact about the ideas of the political left is that they do not work. Therefore we should not be surprised to find the left concentrated in institutions where ideas do not have to work in order to survive"- Thomas Sowell
9 posted on 05/16/2012 8:44:39 AM PDT by TurboZamboni (Looting the future to bribe the present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: shove_it
But how are Dems going to indoctrinate AND buy votes if they allow student loan debt to be dischargable in bankruptcy?

(IMHO, this is why it's not)

10 posted on 05/16/2012 1:01:06 PM PDT by TurboZamboni (Looting the future to bribe the present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

Free tax advice (caveat emptor)...

http://bankruptcy-law.freeadvice.com/bankruptcy-law/consumer_bankruptcy/federal_tax_debt.htm


11 posted on 05/16/2012 1:18:55 PM PDT by shove_it (just undo it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Frank_2001

Kent Conrad thought so,too:

They’re already calling it the “Bismarck Bribe”:

The legislation contains provisions apparently designed to ensure votes from wavering Democrats. As outlined in the House version, the compromise plan would give nonprofit loan providers in several states the right to participate, along with for-profit loan companies selected through a competitive process, in helping the Education Department distribute loan money to students.

A new element, included in the plan issued on Thursday, would give a specific right to the Bank of North Dakota to issue federally subsidized student loans, meaning that it would be the only lender remaining outside of the Education Department’s direct-lending system.

The Bank of North Dakota is a state-owned lender that Democratic aides described as representing the type of nonprofit entity they want to encourage. Critics of the loan bill suggested the provision was designed to win the support of a key Democrat, Sen. Kent Conrad of North Dakota, chairman of the Senate Budget Committee.

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NTY1NmEyMWVlMmZjZjdhZjJkZWJlYzkxYzRlZDQ2ZDY=


12 posted on 05/16/2012 6:45:15 PM PDT by TurboZamboni (Looting the future to bribe the present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

I did not know that. I thought they sold those debts to zombie debt collectors.


13 posted on 05/17/2012 12:21:27 AM PDT by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson