Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Love the Buff but damn she's getting old!
1 posted on 05/16/2012 4:26:23 AM PDT by TSgt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: TSgt

just wrong....a Brokeback kind of Strangelove.

2 posted on 05/16/2012 4:30:24 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TSgt

“The Old Dog”


3 posted on 05/16/2012 4:31:09 AM PDT by grobdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TSgt
I think the awesomeness of the B52 lies more in its ability to deliver massive amounts of ordinance in a somewhat haphazard manner rather than its ability to deliver a few PGMs in a surgical manner. I have heard that men literally shit in their pants when a full payload starts falling in their proximity. A weapon that causes kind of terror will have a place in our airforce for many years to come. PGMs aren't terrifying. They are a symbol of weakness and lack of resolve. Dumb bombs are a different kind of symbol all together.
4 posted on 05/16/2012 4:39:24 AM PDT by RC one (all y'all had to do was vote for Newt but noooooo, he wasn't good enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TSgt
The BUFF still kicks ass


5 posted on 05/16/2012 4:40:08 AM PDT by JRios1968 (I'm guttery and trashy, with a hint of lemon. - Laz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TSgt

Ever seen a BUFF take off up close? Its magnificent. Closest thing to a religious experience I’ve ever had.


7 posted on 05/16/2012 4:52:23 AM PDT by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TSgt

In 1971 I thought the D model in the Lowry training hanger was cool, even as the G & H models were being fielded.
But extending its life to 2040 is a bit beyond ridiculous.


8 posted on 05/16/2012 5:12:42 AM PDT by G Larry (Criminals thrive on the indulgence of society's understanding)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TSgt

9 posted on 05/16/2012 5:14:50 AM PDT by ILS21R (John Locke: When the social contract is broken, the people must revolt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TSgt

What is it that’s “wrong” with the B-52 that it’s service life couldn’t be extended indefinitely?

If the airframes are old, couldn’t they be reproduced? I mean, this is 50 year old tech put together with 50 year old processes. Surely these components could be made today just as easily as they were in the last century.

Or is it the design that’s inadequate somehow? Why can’t it be tweaked rather than replaced with a $multi-billion new model that would be unproven and likely over budget?

It’s already been refitted with revised engines (multiple times, IIRC), so presumably that could continue to happen as engine tech evolves.

It just seems to me we have a proven, working platform that has managed to adapt nicely over the years. Aircrews and pilots are familiar with it, training program is established, spare parts are in inventory. I like new planes as much as the next person, but it seems the B-52 has proven itself as effective at what she does.

Or maybe we no longer need a bomber that does what the B-52 can do?


17 posted on 05/16/2012 5:48:06 AM PDT by chrisser (Starve the Monkeys!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TSgt

Yep - hell of an aircraft. To look at it, one has to wonder what has made it so durable as to last this long. Under a full load, the wing tips flex over 20’ from resting on the wheel struts to airborne. Freakin’ amazing.


19 posted on 05/16/2012 5:51:31 AM PDT by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TSgt

“.........a round of upgrades that will help both the airmen inside each one and also the top-level commanders moving them around on their maps. Even if that commander’s suit is a darker shade of blue:.......”

What’s this “darker shade of blue” crap? U.N.?

Planning today should be excluding the U.N., NOT including the potential of. Think Positive.


20 posted on 05/16/2012 5:52:01 AM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TSgt

BUFS were one of the few aircraft that made our P-3s look like TIFS.


28 posted on 05/16/2012 7:40:12 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TSgt

B-52s with their bays full of:
antimissile drones
‘Wild weasel’ drones
anti-personnel claymore drones
and providing commo links to operators near the battlefield.

The Navy could provide a carrier group to fill in the spaces, but the Army would be reduced to just providing the brooms (until the political idiots go for ‘nation building’ occupation).


35 posted on 05/16/2012 12:06:05 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson