Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: central_va

My point is that he’s doing a good job hanging the queer label on himself. Let him do it; he’s only hurting himself. Most people see this for what it is; not very presidential, and not the leadership we need. We aren’t pushing the queer agenda and everyone knows it. If you want to go wrestle in the mud with the pigs, go right ahead. You should know what happens when you do.

Me, I’m not naive, I’m pragmatic. I want to get rid of 0bama.


17 posted on 05/16/2012 6:07:47 AM PDT by henkster (Wanted: Politicians willing to say "No" to people. No experience required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: henkster

I am voting for Goode.


18 posted on 05/16/2012 6:09:12 AM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: henkster; central_va
I have long advocated the death by 1,000 cuts when dealing with Obama.

Everyone has their own pet peeves. One or more might irritate the average joe to either vote for the other guy or stay home.

The "birther" thing was great in demonstrating the dishonesty and evasiveness of Obama and his team. It was a big gash of one of the 1,000 cuts. Even the dog eating story helps. Even though it sounds irrelevant to most of us, there are people who supported Obama in 2008 who will not in 2012 because he ate dog.

Clinton used Lewinsky (it is just sex) to divert from serious issues that few understood. Most people understand how bad the economy is, so these additional stories will not hurt the effort to remove Obama, but may really help.

23 posted on 05/16/2012 6:18:44 AM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Liberty and Justice for ALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson