Posted on 05/18/2012 1:12:18 AM PDT by plenipotentiary
| No. 11-1185 | ||||
| Title: |
|
|||
| Docketed: | March 29, 2012 | |||
| Lower Ct: | United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit |
| Case Nos.: | (12-5040) |
| Decision Date: | March 6, 2012 |
| ~~~Date~~~ | ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| Mar 28 2012 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 30, 2012) |
| Mar 28 2012 | Motion to expedite consideration of the petition for a writ of certiorari filed by petitioner. |
| Apr 4 2012 | Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 20, 2012. |
| Apr 23 2012 | Motion to expedite consideration filed by petitioner DENIED. |
| May 15 2012 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 31, 2012. |
| ~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | ~~Phone~~~ |
| Attorneys for Petitioner: | ||
| Montgomery Blair Sibley | 4000 Masssachusetts Avenue, N.W. | (202) 478-0371 |
| Suite 1518 | ||
| Washington, DC 20016-1631 | ||
| Party name: Montgomery Blair Sibley | ||
(Excerpt) Read more at supremecourt.gov ...
Uh, why don’t you provide details, as the link provides zero information concerning what this is all about. Hmm?
In Blair Sibley’s quo warranto lawsuit against Obama.....
http://amoprobos.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/issues-are-joined.html
Today I filed a Petition for Review with the District of Columbia Court of Appeals. That Petition seeks judicial review of the determination by the D.C. Board of Elections that Barack Hussein Obama, II, is eligible to appear on the November 6, 2012, General Election ballot as the Democratic Party nominee for President.
http://amoprobos.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/sibley-vs-dc-board-of-elections-ethics.html
http://amoprobos.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/justice-delayed-justice-denied-and.html
Glad you asked. I thought I woke up and became internet illiterate all of a sudden, and didn't want to appear dumb and ask. LOL
Thank you....you did us all a favor.
http://www.civilforfeiture.com/blog/obamamdresponse.pdf
What color is the sky on your planet?
If the courts wanted to play, this game would have been over long ago. Nothing is more clear than the fact that the courts want no part of this matter, and, while I disagree in an intellectual/philosophical sense, I totally get it in the embodied souls living in a practical world sense.
It is not difficult for a United States Court of Appeals, much less the Supreme Court, to "dodge" a Quo Warranto suit filed by a citizen. What's difficult is for them to hear it, and they only do that when they REALLYREALLYREALLY want to, when the facts at issue appeal to either their vanity or their sense of justice.
That does not apply in this case.
Good. The timing for the revelation of the 1991 Acton & Dystel blurb couldn’t be better, then.
“Today I filed a Petition for Review with the District of Columbia Court of Appeals. That Petition seeks judicial review of the determination by the D.C. Board of Elections that Barack Hussein Obama, II, is eligible to appear on the November 6, 2012, General Election ballot as the Democratic Party nominee for President.”
Ping to another bite at the Quo Warranto gambit...distributed for SCOTUS conference.
Andrew Breitbart left us knowing more than he had time to disclose to us.
What did he know that we need to re-discover, document and publish?
Why are ALL of Obama’s important early documents forged?
Where was Obama during his “Lost Years?”
Why are there so few known Obama childhood friends?
How many of Obama’s childhood buddies are still alive?
Was Obama a FOREIGN student at Occidental, Columbia or Harvard?
Who wrote the checks for Obama’s education?
Where these question that Andrew Beitbart knew some of the answers to?
____________
To tie the above with some speculative food for thought, please indulge me, (but DO ponder the speculations), as I re-post one of my recently updated comments as follows:
A dictator, such as Obama, only has the power that the people give him.
Currently, at least 40 % of polled American voters are gladly willing to give Obama the necessary power to continue his arrogant dictatorship.
About 47 % of American voters pay NO Personal Federal Income Taxes. These voters are the “fair share” voter base for Dictator Obama. We, in the 53 %, then are paying this 47 % to vote for Obama by virtue of us paying taxes for ourselves AND them.
In this manner we are supporting the voters who vote for Obama, and they will vote to do so again in November.
Dictator Obama has designed Obama”care” to become active only AFTER he is to be re-elected, thus enabling THE NINE SUPREMES to delay ruling on the Constitutionality of the dictate of the individual mandate until Obama is once again the Illegal Foreign White House Occupier, (IFWHO).
The purpose of Dictator Baby-Doc Barack is simple: 1.) Regulate; 2.) Control; and 3.) Destroy. By his own count he has already achieved 60 % of his goals, according to the note he says he carries in his pocket.
Obama’s obvious arrogant and deep hatred of America could have only come from what he was taught in his childhood.
Since there are no known networks of childhood friends from Obama’s past, Obama was probably a member of a Marxist sleeper cell funded by wealthy men with a Marxist view of the World.
The lack of credible documents that has NOT been forged requires a long-term, highly skilled and well-funded support group.
Who the key members of Obama’s probable support group and probable sleeper cell were and are is well known to the Interpol, CIA and the FBI.
Will “Citizen Journalists” such as Breitbart Editor Joel Pollack be able to out-spy the latter two US tax-funded spy entities?
BTW, forget about the LAM, (Liberal Agenda Media), as they are saving their notes to write their tell-all Obama books after Obama has SAFELY retired back home in Kenya.
BTW, BTW, to all the doubters of the above speculations: what does your gut tell you?
______________________
The questions we ask
Are simple to say,
One wonders why they
Were not asked,
Back in the Day?
Meanwhile, the drumbeat of Dictator, (in his own mind), Obama grows louder:
regulate —— control —— destroy —— Regulate —— control —— destroy —— REgulate —— control —— destroy —— REGulate —— control —— destroy —— REGU
.
Jun 4 2012 Petition DENIED.
No dissents, no recusals, no opinion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.