To: QT3.14
I say that if any “man” has a problem with it, they are free to take their place.
Anything else is just bravado from an easy chair.
34 posted on
05/19/2012 11:35:17 AM PDT by
VanDeKoik
(If case you are wondering, I'm STILL supporting Newt.)
To: VanDeKoik
A lot of us HAVE taken their place, and think it is right that American men continue to do so.
37 posted on
05/19/2012 11:40:44 AM PDT by
Mr Rogers
(A conservative can't please a liberal unless he jumps in front of a bus or off of a cliff)
To: VanDeKoik
How does that emotional outburst make any logical sense in regards to this liberal agenda to weaken our Military?
56 posted on
05/19/2012 12:03:45 PM PDT by
ansel12
(When immutable definition of Bible marriage of One Man, One Woman, is in jeopardy, call the Mormon.)
To: VanDeKoik
“I say that if any “man” has a problem with it, they are free to take their place.”
Nope. There are quotas to be met. We men do serve. We don’t want to serve with other troops not capable including women. We are also free to leave the military and let the women fight since we don’t want to be dead next to them.
62 posted on
05/19/2012 12:10:07 PM PDT by
CodeToad
(Homosexuals are homophobes. They insist on being called “gay” instead.)
To: VanDeKoik
I’ve done my time.
Your position is moronic.
63 posted on
05/19/2012 12:10:51 PM PDT by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: VanDeKoik
“Anything else is just bravado from an easy chair.”
Kind of like the easy chair of 30+% of women getting pregnant during war time to avoid deployment, or getting pregnant to get off the ship, you mean that kind of easy chair?
64 posted on
05/19/2012 12:11:56 PM PDT by
CodeToad
(Homosexuals are homophobes. They insist on being called “gay” instead.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson