Posted on 05/20/2012 6:29:08 AM PDT by Libloather
Sound familiar?
Ditto the Clintons and their fake, cynical "marriage". Ditto the past and present marital situations of John Edwards, the Jesse Jacksons and other liberals icons and fallen idols.
The institution of marriage means nothing to these amoral "leaders". Women are betrayed/ discarded/shuffled around like they are soul-less paper dolls and the women allow the men to get away with it....and vice versa holds true, also.
Money, greed, fame and lust for power motivates these men and women. They have no resemblance to human beings or to being human. The social clergy and priesthood in the country never castigates their marital arrangements and scandals, let alone casts them out, even figuratively. The corrupt media loves them for the aberrational sensationalism they generate. The younger generations are beginning to view these venal scenarios playing out among our country's "leaders" as normal.
The headline on this thread is "Can Tipper Sue the Sex Poodle for Adultery?". What a disgusting headline....made worse when one realizes it refers to a former Vice President of the United States and the former Second Lady.
I think this title viewed metaphorically just about wraps up the present marital life-styles of too many of the rich, famous and political......not to mention encapsulating in a few words the lowered standards of a country sliding rapidly towards Gomorrah.
We have, thankfully, a remarkable chance to send all these low-life, cheap-novel characters to the dustbin of history in November, 2012.
Leni
“She’s not bad looking for somebody in her 50’s.”
My method for determining ultimate sexual attractiveness is based on two adages:
!. Never go to bed with anyone crazier than myself.
2. Liberalism is a mental disorder (Michael Savage).
Anyone attracted to Al Gore is crazy, ergo, not attractive.
operative words “not clear on when the two started dating” cough cough
oMG are you serious
Leni
I completely agree. I have no patience with adulterers and they will reap the consequences of their sexual sin as will the homosexuals, the pedophiles the rapists and all others who commit sexual sin.
. There is 'care' here in this disclosure. Only a 'background' in science. Most likely; just enough to be dangerous.
Given that ignorance is bliss these two, could well be, very happy.
Interesting. Adultery was, within my lifetime, a crime, a tort, and a sin.
Most people still hold to the naive belief that, somehow, there must be some way for the victim to recover money damages or some other sort of recompense from "the system", but this is not the case.
Adultery has been decriminalized either by statute or custom in all 50 states, and it (usually) has no effect whatsoever in a divorce proceeding (in my state, "equitable division" can vary by up to 10% as a sanction for adultery, most states don't go that far).
Quite an interesting turn of events in less than 40 years, eh?
Makes you wonder if this why AlGore “invented” the Internet...for the dating sites?
You are obviously past the stage of life when those psycho chicks are attractive.
Here's my advice to my sons and younger friends:
1) On the first date, as soon as she mentions her meds or her therapist, count to 300 and excuse yourself to go to the men's room.
2) Open the window.
3) Climb out.
4) Run home at a moderate speed.
5) Take your name off the mailbox.
6) Take your phone off the hook, if it is after 5pm.
6) In the morning, or if it is before 5pm, call the phone company and have your number changed.
7) Don't go out for three months in the same neighborhood.
I have done the market research on this my FRiends, to save you all the trouble. Take it as gospel, from one who knows.
Not to mention Mary Kennedy's suicide.
What was that about a war on women?
Not to mention Mary Kennedy's suicide.
What was that about a war on women?
You are right. Blasted “therapists” are sociopaths who thrive on telling people how to run their lives, it is a huge scam and anyone who falls for it is soft in the head.
See Against therapy Emotional Tyranny and the Myth of Psychological Healing, by Jeffrey Moussaieff Masson. From the cover: “In 1981, Jeffrey Moussaieff Masson was fired from his position as projects director of the Sigmund Freud Archives, shortly after suggesting that Freud had intentionally suppressed a key finding from his earlier work—the so called seduction theory. Masson’s claim—and the enormously controversial book, The Assault on Truth, in which he put it forward—became front page news. Masson’s research led him to question not only the history of psychoanalysis, but—more important—its very premise. Now in Against Therapy, Masson shows how from the beginning, psychotherapy has been designed to impose the therapist’s views on the patient, not to alleviate his (or, most often, her) suffering...........Masson demonstrates that all psychotherapies—from classical Freudianism to feminist and Gestalt therapies—are dangerous by nature.....More than that Against Therapy suggests that our devotion to the structures of psychotherapy has closed the door to ways of alleviating mental suffering that are not sexist or based upon the imposition of the therapist’s will upon the patient.”
Copyright 1988
Atheneum
Macmillan Publishing Company
It probably depends on whether or not his second chakra has been released.
Is there any way that you can come up with a creative jingle to remind us all that Hussein, one of the very few Muslims, received a Nobel Prize?
BTTT! An asolute necessity, because they represent those "who call evil good and good evil. Indeed, woe unto those who even call the-best-we-can-do-under-the-circumstances evil [like voting for a "RINO"], for it is easy to make matters worse, and impossible to make them better without trade-offs, unintended consequences, and unaccountable feedback from human nature. ....." HERE: Rules for Radicals and Nostrums for Gnostics
<>
What impels a man (like Obama) to Gnosticism?
<>
"...The marketplace of ideas is supposed to be a.. struggle for or toward truth. But what if it becomes a struggle for and against truth? ..."
HERE: Ideological Intolerance of Reality and Metastatic Hope
<>
"..."When 'socialist man' speaks, man has to be silent," which is a rather polite way of putting it. In any event, it is why the left would like for us to shut up, why they impose speech codes, why political correctness abounds, and why they hate God and religion. ..." HERE: There Is No Truth, and Only the Left Possesses It
More:
"....The world seems so obviously defective, why should it make sense? In other words, perhaps all the disorder in and around us results from the fact that the disorder is built in. We look for truth, for meaning, for order, but in vain, since there is none to be had.
That's certainly one way of looking at it, and we actually respect the person who looks at it this way, so long as he truly lives by it -- NIETZSCHE, for example.
One of Nietzsche's finer qualities was that he at least had the good sense to merely go insane, instead of trying to impose his insanity on the rest of us, as have so many other existentialists.
If you want to go nuts, hey, go nuts! But what gives you the right to impose your insanity on the collective? What, are you nuts? What if I don't want to be rescued by a bunch of statist nuts? ....."
<>
"If you want to understand the modern Left, read Dostoevsky's The Possessed. Trust me" ~RJ Moeller on Twitter [5/19/12]
#free #ebooks @gutenberg_org: The Possessed (The Devils) by Fyodor Dostoyevsky
Bookmarked for delving into your enticing links this evening.
Leni
We should thank Bill Clinton for not resigning and remaining entrenched as President, despite his impeachment, and split vote for his conviction in the Senate. He was obviously well aware that if did step aside, that Al Gore who is obviously nuttier than a squirrel turd, would’ve been left in charge.
Even Tipper figured that out.
BTTT
"...the vast majority of academic "product" is merely junk food for the mind (as always, we are speaking of the humanities, or subhumanities, to be exact). No, I don't have a study to prove that, but how would one go about doing so, anyway? Let's just say that for me, most academic books and papers are so tedious, or tendentious, or narrow, or poorly written, or frankly perverse, that a normal person would want nothing to do with them.
For example, most of the psychology journals I see are so dopey as to be laughable. And I mean that literally. (Let me say at the outset that there are a number of excellent psychoanalytic journals, but psychoanalysis is not exactly an academic discipline but a clinical one; it only becomes stupid in the hands of academics.) I don't subscribe to any of the big journals in my field. In fact, I'm not even a member of my professional association, the American Psychological Association, because it's just a front for a totolerantarian gang of leftist activists. But I do see some of the journals laying around the office, and I do occasionally flip through them for a laugh. To say that they are shallow does not even begin to address the problem. Virtually every issue has some big study about multiculturalism and the need for what is called cultural competence. ...[snip]
"I am very fortunate, because I entered my masters program (1982) before these toxic and dysfuntiuonal ideas had permeated academia. Moreover, I completed my PhD at a private training institute with a strong psychoanalytic orientation, so I am one of those apparently rare individuals who has a PhD in the humanities without ever having had to seriously contend with the obnoxious PC brainwashing.
A magazine such as Psychology Today represents stupidity squared, because it mostly boils down the nonsense of academia for a semi-literate audience, in the same way that Time or Newsweek purvey idiotarian liberal conventional wisdom to the 8th grade mass-mentality. " ...." .
"..Let's spend a moment looking at this Psychology Today article, which tries to explain the underlying psychological reasons for why someone would be conservative." .. [snip] ~Robert W.Godwin [Gagdad Bob] , Ph.D is a clinical psychologist whose interdisciplinary work has focused on the relationship between contemporary psychoanalysis, chaos theory, and quantum physics
We have, thankfully, a remarkable chance to send all these low-life, cheap-novel characters to the dustbin of history in November, 2012.
************************************
BTTT ... DITTO and You betcha!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.