Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor
phys.org ^ | 5/21/12 | Marcia Goodrich

Posted on 05/21/2012 3:30:16 AM PDT by LibWhacker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: Stosh
By the way, Li3N will be very water sensitive, so much so that I expect it will react spontaneously with moisture in the atmosphere, which will further complicate any real use of this system.

A bigger complication: you get Li3N by exposing Li to nitrogen. Refining lithium, however, consumes 35 kWh/kg. In comparison, burning one kg of coal produces just 2 kWh of heat energy (and much less than that in actual electrical output)

21 posted on 05/21/2012 6:22:54 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (If I can't be persuasive, I at least hope to be fun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I reject the premise of the title that CO2 is “lemons”.


22 posted on 05/21/2012 6:24:00 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Very cool. But I still don’t get why people want to suffocate the plants.


23 posted on 05/21/2012 6:53:23 AM PDT by Suz in AZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird
Another fertilizer bomb...

This tech does seem pretty cool. It it is as good as it sounds, Al Gore and the other environmental pimps won't be happy because they really don't want solutions.

24 posted on 05/21/2012 7:15:07 AM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Liberty and Justice for ALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Vanders9

In my gut I suspect that the formation of lithium nitride requires a lot of energy, particularly if the starting material is elemental lithium. Production of elemental lithium is a highly energy intensive process.


25 posted on 05/21/2012 7:24:06 AM PDT by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
17.5 X Coal energy cost -- forget it!

Bingo! The answer as to why this will remain a laboratory curiosity -- at least as far as disposal of CO2 is concerned.

IF somone develops a semiconductor process/product based on the reaction product, a few Kg of CO2 might be sequestered by it. Qtherwise, it is a mere curiosity...

Of course, let me be the first to point out that there is ZERO need to "sequester" atmospheric CO2 in the first place...

26 posted on 05/21/2012 8:59:12 AM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson