1. Rather, Hawaii officials are more worried about what other states will do if Hawaii officials give in quickly and easily to Bennett's request.
2. That is, if other states see how quickly Hawaii responds to Bennett's request for verification of Obama's birth certificate, then they might all start making their own requests, and all those requests could be a major headache for Hawaii officials. Just some food for thought.
3. In the end, I believe that Hawaii and Arizona will come to some agreement that will allow Obama to be placed on the Arizona Nov. 2012 presidential ballot.
4. But what I will find interesting is this: I wonder who will blink first, that is, who will cave in to the other's demand/request first.
5. Also, it will be interesting to see how Hawaii responds to Bennett's request.
6. Will Hawaii merely send Bennett a single sentence statement like "Yes, we have Obama's birth certificate on file."
7. Or, will Hawaii write a long, detailed explanation that it has Obama's long form birth certificate on file and, at the same time, severely criticize Bennett for asking for such information in the first place.
8. Again, I believe that Bennett will have no choice, and he will put Obama's name on the Nov. 2012 ballot, because there will be so much public pressure for him to do so.
His lawyers had a chance to show his BC in Georgia and Atlanta, and refused. No lawyer wants to touch that longform with a 10 foot pole, with good reason.
Corsi has an insider, and they know for a fact that the BC was cooked up after Abercromby came into office.
We are now down to brass tacks, and no one in Hawaii wants to attach their name and their law license to this hoax.