Can you explain why conservatives didnt select someone else in the primaries?
Oh, you know the answers to this one, it was pretty obvious:
1. Overwhelmingly funding disadvantages on the conservatives part.
2. Character assassination by Romney, including lying about both candidates with add 24/7 using that funding disadvantage.
3. A conservative press that refused to vet the record of Romney.
posted on 05/21/2012 10:11:05 PM PDT
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
Why couldn’t other candidates raise more money from conservatives, when there is such a huge tea party/ conservative movement?
All you’re saying is, the others lost. They didn’t raise enough money, the media didn’t help them, and Romney’s attacks worked on them.
It’s hardly a conspiracy or rocket science, they just lost.
In any event, I assume this was not a likely voters poll?
posted on 05/21/2012 10:16:28 PM PDT
A large segment of Republicans are “moderate.”
posted on 05/22/2012 10:54:21 AM PDT
by Little Ray
(FOR the best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson