Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WOSG

Nobody has said that Romney didn’t get a larger share in his primary than Obama did in his.

Instead, we’re pointing out that even though he supposedly has it in the bag, he’s still having trouble getting 70% of Republicans to vote for him. That much is mathematical fact, however you’d like to try to spin it. Fact is - a large chunk of the GOP electorate still isn’t reconciling themselves to him, despite all the “Anybody but Obama/You have to vote for Romney or else you’re voting for Obama” scaremongering.


25 posted on 05/23/2012 7:10:42 PM PDT by Yashcheritsiy (A conservative voting for Romney is like a chicken voting for Col. Sanders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Yashcheritsiy

Again, you dont get it ...your mathematical ‘fact’ means little. Romney getting 70% is fine - any other candidate running would be thrilled to be there right now - he’s not an incumbent and its enough to get it in the bag.
Obama getting 60% is an embarrassment - he’s a sitting president with NO OPPONENT.

I probably wont vote for Romney in the primary, will vote Newt just to show the conservative voter strength, and will gladly walk on broken glass to vote for him over Obama in the november election. Hopefully you have the same attitude.


26 posted on 05/24/2012 9:43:33 PM PDT by WOSG (Anyone But Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson