Actually it does. Other scientists who have lab equipment and who are paid to do such things have either refuted the article or ignored it, going by your non-response. Either, way, that indicates it's junk.
I see no reason why someone on a conservative politics forum should have to do the work that scientists have had 19 years to do.
Address the science in the paper.
Will you ever address the scientific response to the paper? You're the one promoting a disreputable science. The burden of proof is on you.
The "scientific response" has exactly zero to do with the quality of science IN the paper. Your constant assertions to the contrary are simply your continuing intellectual dishonesty. The paper is there. The methodology and results are there. Show me the errors in them. Or post a link to a paper that has refuted/falsified that specific paper. Constantly ducking the issue simply proves again that you are a fraud.