Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Clintonfatigued

If Clement is nominated, the libs and media will say he shouldn’t serve since he argued the Obamacare case. They will claim that shows him as too partisan. Seriously - they will make that argument with a straight face.


5 posted on 05/26/2012 2:23:43 PM PDT by TexasNative2000 (Jimmy Carter's incompetence + Richard Nixon's paranoia = Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TexasNative2000

“If Clement is nominated, the libs and media will say he shouldn’t serve since he argued the Obamacare case. They will claim that shows him as too partisan. Seriously - they will make that argument with a straight face.”

My answer to that:
Thurgood Marshall...

.... who, after arguing and winning Brown v. Board of Education at the Supreme Court, was nominated to fill the next vacancy there....

And then, go ahead with it.


62 posted on 05/26/2012 9:41:18 PM PDT by Road Glide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: TexasNative2000
If Clement is nominated, the libs and media will say he shouldn’t serve since he argued the Obamacare case. They will claim that shows him as too partisan. Seriously - they will make that argument with a straight face.

That would argue that Thurgood Marshall of Brown vs. Board of Education fame should never have been seated on the court. I'm up for that debate any time any place.

65 posted on 05/26/2012 10:56:17 PM PDT by jimfree (In Nov 2012 my 11 y/o granddaughter will have more relevant executive experience than Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson