To: okie01
reflects nothing more than an opinion on a legal matter which is yet to be resolved.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Ah, but it has been resolved. See my previous post (#51)
52 posted on
05/28/2012 7:12:32 AM PDT by
New Jersey Realist
(America: home of the free because of the brave)
To: New Jersey Realist
If it's a matter of allegiance, then Obama doesn't qualify. He has more allegiance to his foreign half than to the USA. This is the problem w arguing that the Framers were fine w the children of foreigners who happened to be born on US soil: divided loyalties. The idea that they actually endorsed divided loyalties for the office of POTUS, or even undivided foreign loyalties [as in a person born of two foreign parents on US soil] is ridiculous.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson