Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PapaBear3625
Turning on the lights may have been useful for identifying the intruder, but would also illuminate THEM to a potentially-armed intruder.

Odds are that if they could see her enough in the dark to shoot her, then she could see them. If she meant them harm she could have done it in the dark as well as the light. In most cases the advantage of illumination goes to the one who controls the switch. In this case he would have the added advantage of the gun and the light switch.

If all papabears in history shot first in the dark and then identified their targets later, think of all the baby bears that would never have known Goldilocks. How Grimm would that be???

81 posted on 05/28/2012 10:12:21 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: Uncle Chip
It's a very safe bet than an intruder that meant to do harm would have done so before the home owner awakened and failing to accomplish that would have definitely attacked the instant he/she was challenged. You would think a psychologist would know that much about people.

There's a lot of nonsense here about taking lengthy interviews being synonymous with identifying a target but no such comparison is realistic. Nor is the need to turn on any lights. I can identify persons in the dark of my own home and know it well enough that I can move quietly through it on the darkest of nights. If I thought I had an intruder in the house that's exactly what I would do. On the other hand a tac light, as mentioned up-thread, would absolutely blind whoever you shined it on. Painfully so if it's a good one.

But that's OK. People can do what they like. They usually do and there are a few living in Canyon City, CO who thought our Make-My-Day law here was a free pass to shoot anyone in their house. I bet they'd love to share their opinions about it with us but I don't think they get internet access unless they play real nice with their bunk-mates and wait staff. ;-)

82 posted on 05/28/2012 12:31:25 PM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Chip; PapaBear3625

If she meant them harm she could have done it in the dark as well as the light. In most cases the advantage of illumination goes to the one who controls the switch. In this case he would have the added advantage of the gun and the light switch.


Most bedroom light switches are located next to the door. She was in the bedroom. So, who had the “advantage” of the light switch?

Would you suggest a victim of home invasion attempt to slip past a potential drug crazed Treyvon on the off chance the intruder just might be a drunken coed?


84 posted on 05/28/2012 3:20:18 PM PDT by Rides_A_Red_Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson