Yes, he is an actor, which means he makes his living creating fantasy for dullards, lying and making boatloads of money for it.
He lies for a living. Why anyone would listen to anything he has to say outside of his profession is beyond my understanding.
Did you just equate the art of fiction with lying?
Questions:
What difference is there between an actor and a fantasy writer then, given both "makes a[] living creating fantasy for dullards"?
Or do you likewise assert that the fiction writer also lies for a living?
Furthermore, doesn't the "why listen to someone talking outside their profession" philosophy automatically discount the unemployed? Wouldn't it also reject out-of-hand the homeless man who claims that property taxes are unreasonable and unethical?