Experts Weigh in After Four Witnesses in Trayvon Martin Case Change Story

The New American ^ | 28 May, 2012 | Alex Newman

[editor-surveyor]

>> “Zimmerman will construct a jury full of crime victims and recent immigrants.” <<

.
I guarantee that the judge will eliminate all of them. Been through that in jury selection before. The judge thins the herd first.

[editor-surveyor]

>> Who controls “forensics?” <<

.
Both sides will have their own forensic team and examination. Levitity cannot be fudged anyway.

[Lancey Howard]

Yeah..!
In fact, I much prefer “race profiteers” to the old “race hustlers”.
The word “profiteers” is much more of a thumb in the eye to the communist Democrats.

Excellent.

[hummingbird]

Why can’t ME’s and Physicians take a course in handwriting or at least have an assistant that can write up their reports so the average person can read them?! Argh......

[BraveMan]

FReepers are an ever entertaining source of information . . .

Johnny Roseboro incident

[Tijeras_Slim]

It’s part of the mystique I suppose.

[ex91B10]

"Several key witnesses in the shooting death of Trayvon Martin by Neighborhood Watch captain George Zimmerman have changed their original stories since first being interviewed by law enforcement, according to news reports about recently released evidence in the case. Some analysts cited in the media speculated that three of those revised accounts might hurt the shooter’s claims of self-defense as the second-degree murder prosecution goes through the Florida court system." [Bold mine]

[Done in my best Raymond Burr]: "Were you lying then or are you lying now?"

[justice14]

and so impressed by all that rapper hiphop crap that obama and moochelle celebrate at our WH

I agree completely. I just had a discussion about this with a teacher friend who teaches in inner city Philly. He was stating how kids idolize rappers who talk about violence, women, drugs, and boos. That creates a huge social problem and is a very sad state.

[SoCal Pubbie]

Obviously forensics can show that the shot was fired into Martin’s chest at close range and not some other scenario such as in the back as he was running away. But can it really determine that Martin was on top, versus both men standing face to face? I am not questioning Zimmerman’s account, just asking if anyone has enough knowledge here to explain how that works. It seems to me the path of the bullet, powder burns, etc, could be the same in either case. Of course that’s assuming the bullet remained in Martin’s body, and did not exit to hit something else that would complete the retracing of the bullet’s path.