Replies

This issue really grates on their nerves. I watched the video of the CNN Trump interview.

The same tired counter arguments from CNN employees like "but.. but it was published in a newspaper."

The CNN employee totally ignored Trump's mention that there is no record of Obama's mother being in a hospital at the time and no reaction from the CNN employee when Mr. Trump mentioned that publisher's biographical sketch of Obama.

I was not born in a hospital. The official record in the state contains only the information that my parents provided when they got around to registering my birth weeks later;

.. so YES! the state of Kentucky's records could confirm that a Photoshop-generated imagine of a b.c. contains information present in the state's records; and if my parents had lied about a hospital that would not change the fact the state could still honestly declare that the "Photoshop-generated imagine of a b.c. contains information present in the state's records;"

.. and yes whatever information my parents put on the forms all must be true because my birth announcement was published in a stupid newspaper. Go figure.

I just heard some relatively conservative folks (Imus fill-in host and Imus staff) discuss the Trump CNN interview. They opined that "the issue has been adjudicated" and also the White House released the long-form b.c. It's old news. It's settled.

Obviously those conservative folks' source of "news" is limited to the MSM (Fox).

So if "trees are falling" everyday they will know nothing about them because the MSM will not (are not permitted to?) report it. Spiking is an old, old practice and the worst form of bias IMO.

The more the questions of Obama's veracity irritates them the more I like it! It's expanded beyond the b.c. It's about Obama's lies about himself. Pothead Barry.