[d-back]

And that verbal "instruction" is not protected as free speech, and it should constitute a conspiracy to commit child abuse, a criminal conviction, and jail time?

Hmmm. Think about that.

[dmz]

And that verbal “instruction” is not protected as free speech, and it should constitute a conspiracy to commit child abuse, a criminal conviction, and jail time?

Hmmm. Think about that.

<><>><<

The folks who actually had access to all of the facts, and were instructed on the relevant portions of Wisconsin law found the guy guilty in a hot minute.

Hmmm. Think about that.