Replies

” meanwhile, you “trot out” no proof at all that contradicts the statements of myself and Kaufman”

What makes you think that you and Kaufman are credible?

In your little world, everyone in the Middle East is Al Quada or a sympathizer.

And the fact that al-Juwali has reorganized the army to include militias, and has used that army to take on al-Quada militias contradicts your opinion that al-Juwali is al-Quada.

There’s nothing in al-Juwali’s background or actions that connects him to al-Quada.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osama_al-Juwali

You apparently don’t have the acumen to explore other possibilites that are outside your world view. Al-Juwali’s military leadership is keeping a lid on the pot and preventing it from boiling over.

What makes you think that you and Kaufman are credible?

You’re talking like a liberal plant now, trying to put words in my mouth that I did not say (figuratively). Your attempts at defanging the term “Islamist” say as much.

If you have any evidence (beyond Wikiliberalism) that al-Juwaili is not an Islamist who wants to put Libya under strict Sharia law (which makes him, as I said before, the equivalent of al-Qaeda), let’s see it. Otherwise, I’m sticking with the political candidate’s statement on this one. And as far as Libya goes, who wants the lid on the pot so that they can get sufficiently organized to attack the West again—or even worse, to ally with Iran as Egypt is doing?