Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GlockThe Vote
I hope the Obama is better than Romney crowd here looks in the damn mirror ASAP.

AIN'T gonna happen, not as long as they choose to formulate their myopic arguments as one which is based on "PRINCIPLES," and has as its core, "Social Issues," such as Gay Marriage, Abortion, etc.....AT THE EXPENSE of our National Security, our Safety, and our SURVIVAL....!

Though they frame their arguments going so far as to question those who will not accept them--or voting for Mittens--as being "Anti-Christian" or more delusional, "Anti-Patriotic" it is they who are willing to ignore the very real threat and danger (BASED ON EVIDENCE OF DEAR LEADER'S ACTIONS SINCE HIS CORONATION) posed if O'Bummer get's another 4 years to continue his attacks on Capitalism, Rights, Liberties and Freedoms as well as his "Capitualtion" and "Submission" to our enemies as he aligns himself ever more with those who would ("destroy our miserable house from within, by our own hand") replace our Consitution with Sharia (Muslim Brotherhood) and other Radical Islamists....going to far as to appoint and accept several members associated therewith, as advisors and high positions within his Regime.

Yes, while Social Issues are important to we Christians and we should never forego fighting for them, IF we have no Republic as we know it 4 years hence, how much good will that do us then?

To me (as a Vet and Patriot) the Security and Safety of the United States trumps all else. Perhaps that makes me a "Bad" Christian (Catholic) and if that be the case, I'll let GOD be my judge and so be it.

However everyone else decides to vote in November, the outcome will be on their/our/my conscience and I know that I won't have any regrets or have any trouble sleeping nights.

Will those who HATE Romney/Mormons and call for a boycott against Mittens--if their action helps reelect Barack Hussein Obama--be able to say the same???

12 posted on 06/01/2012 4:02:43 AM PDT by Conservative Vermont Vet (l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Conservative Vermont Vet

“...AT THE EXPENSE of our National Security, our Safety, and our SURVIVAL...”

Explain to me how a self-avowed Progressive and admirer of Alinsky, one Mitt Romney, could be considered supportive of our national security, our safety, and our survival?

Romney is a Globalist, and doesn’t give a damn about our God-given rights as U.S. citizens. He sees himself as a citizen of the world, very much like BHO2.

This situation, fellow veteran, is the crux of the matter: neither candidate is much different one from the other. The question is, who of the two men should we believe will not follow through on their natural intentions?

Frankly, I’m outraged at the choice. It’s like choosing between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea!


20 posted on 06/01/2012 4:19:10 AM PDT by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson