I didn't say they were the same. I said that Romney wouldn't make much difference versus Obama.
Face it, most everything you list doesn't involve actual governing policy. Yet, how they would govern is what I'm talking about. Both of these men are pro-abortion, pro-gay, pro-progressive taxation, support abridging religious freedom when it's "necessary," support government run health care, have raised taxes, believe in manmade climate change and support cap-and-trade type policies, support gun control, etc. These are all facts, however much you may personally dislike them. Frankly, it doesn't matter if Romney's white, not a Muslim, and doesn't hang out with Bill Ayers. He's still a lousy candidate with a lousy record that suggests that on actual, substantial governing policy, he's not going to be much different from Obama. Like it or not.
>>Yet, how they would govern is what I’m talking about. <<
Obama has governed by executive order with EPA and IRS Stormtroopers squelching every bit of descent. The ONLY branch of government that has made ANY headway with the Marxist in Chief has been the Supreme Court.
Put Obama in and have Thomas or Scalia come up ill and you’ll get another Wise Latina or perhaps Holder himself.
The choices are not the same.