[EdReform]

That latter quote is significant, as it raises the possibility from a prominent official, one assigned credibility by two governments and the media, that the intent of “gunwalking” may not have been to “maintain operational control of those weapons.”

More proof that the intent of Fast and Furious was to undermine the Second Amendment.

[OneWingedShark]

More proof that the intent of Fast and Furious was to undermine the Second Amendment.

No, not the 2nd... the whole Constitution.
Congress only has the power to declare war (and therefore authorize acts of war), yet these were perpetrated by these agencies. That no corrective action has been taken is quite significant, it illustrates how little concern for the Constitution there is among two whole branches of governance.

This is also furthered by illustrations of all the Natural Born Citizen cases that have been thrown out (usually due "lack of standing or sometimes technicality [usually administrative, rather than legal]). This illustrates that the third branch of government also holds the constitution in disregard.

Given the following definition for Natural Born Citizen

A citizen who was born in the country* of two married citizens [of any type].

* The segment "born in the country" is arguable. No person would claim that an Ambassador who married a citizen and took her with him on assignment, subsequently having a child, would claim that child was not a [natural born] citizen.
That both parties offered ineligible (at least arguably) candidates, John McCain (due to the technicality of birth-location) & Obama (self-admittedly NOT the child of TWO citizens) -- and now two narguably unqualified candidates Romney (father not a citizen at the time of his birth) and Obama -- is deeply disturbing considering the conventional wisdom that nobody can win [the presidency] who is not in one of those two parties. It's almost as if they were trying a Xanatos Gambit to invalidate the Constitution.
But that's all just crazy conspiracy guy talk, right?