Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: donna
To: Conservative Vermont Vet

Romney: Gay couples raising kids is the American way

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1846225/posts

Well, WHOOP-DE-FREEKING-DOO!

Five years ago, Romney might have mispoken or he may have been serious.

AND, how does that make him 10 times worst that "he" who never met an abotion he didn't like or supported INFANTICIDE (moved to block vote on Infant Born Alive Bill) as a Illinois Senator or supports Gay Marriage?

MOREOVER, as I apparently have to keep repeating, while Social Issues ARE important, HOW is this position of Romney's (if in fact it is) a THREAT to our SECURITY AND SURVIVAL????

Sorry, it looks like its back to the drawing board and try a little harder next time.

32 posted on 06/03/2012 3:57:34 PM PDT by Conservative Vermont Vet (l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Conservative Vermont Vet
Think you'll win a lot of votes by talking that way to folks who hold traditional values?

Or maybe, like liberals, you just hate the people who stay true to traditional values?

33 posted on 06/03/2012 4:12:54 PM PDT by donna (Mitt quote: ...gay couples raising kids. That's the American way...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Conservative Vermont Vet; donna
while Social Issues ARE important

What is a "Social Issue"?

I know about threats to the Constitution such as the movement to deny the Right to Life, a movement to make certain perverted behavoirs protected classes with 'rights' above and beyond those guaranteed, a movement to destroy the 2nd Amendment, and various other movements aimed at weakening or misinterpreting the Constitution.

"Social Issues"? Is that how Matt Lauer, katie Couric or Tingles Matthews refer to the Constitutional issues I just mentioned? Maybe you better tune them out. A threat to the U.S. Constitution from a domestic enemy is as grave a threat to the U.S. Constitution/security from a foreign enemy, if not greater. I already laid out for you why I will not vote for Willard, and why your (and others) scare tactics ring hollow. Willard is a threat to the U.S. Constitution, only slightly less so than Hussein in many respects. The only difference is that Willard would have the cooperation of Congress. Yes, I am supporting Conservative candidates nationwide with efforts and $$$. The House and Senate is where we make our stand these next 4 years. The White house? Forget it.
35 posted on 06/03/2012 4:33:16 PM PDT by kevcol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson