That twit son of hers is in fact a highly intelligent, funny, charming man who will make a fine King one day.
Yes, I have met him.
The majority of the British public likes him, and has agreed with, for example, his attacks on modern architecture and how we have literally destroyed our finest buildings in the name of ‘progress’.
Americans like you seem to have a beef with him because of that silly dead bimbo he married OR because he has said he wants to ‘defend all faiths’, which has been stupidly interpretated as Charles therefore being a ‘dhimmi’, when he has publicly defended Christianity and Judaism on many occasions, and is simply against oppressive secularisation.
He is also very fond, btw, of your country and people.
The royals have many fine qualities and seem to be decent and caring people.
I admire them personally, those that have have served in war and peace for the good of all the world’s people.
My problem is not with them personally, it is with the idea of inheriting political power by right of birth.
Celebrating the presence of any king or queen in Britain, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, etc. is an obscenity.
The difference with Britain is that they have had a ringside seat to the primacy and dominance of a Republic form of government and yet sully themselves with royalty.
American “commoners” will always stand taller than anyone’s royalty. To all Brit commoners: you can do better, the sorriest Irishman has more dignity.
I have a problem with his liberal positions on global warming and the environment, for the most part. Who he shares a bed with is of no interest to me. We in California are reaping the consequences of over regulation and outrageous energy taxes on small businesses. I have very low regard for limosine liberals in general.