Skip to comments.Playing With Words (Thomas Sowell)
Posted on 06/04/2012 1:32:44 PM PDT by jazusamo
Would anyone work to support themselves or their families and then turn over a chunk of that hard-earned money to somebody else, just because of the words used by that somebody else?
A few people may be taken in by the words of con men, here and there, but the larger tragedy is that millions more are taken in by the words of politicians, the top-of-the-line con men.
How do politicians con people out of their money? One example can be found in a recent article titled "The Autism-Welfare Nexus" by Paul Sperry in "Investor's Business Daily."
Genuine autism is a truly tragic condition, both for those afflicted by it and for their parents. Few people would have any problem with the idea that both voluntary donations and government expenditures are well spent to help those suffering from autism.
"Autism," however, has been sweepingly redefined over the years. What was discovered and defined as autism back in 1943 is just one of a number of conditions now included as being part of "the autism spectrum." Many, if not most, of these conditions are nowhere near as severe as autism, or even as clearly defined.
The growing number of children encompassed by a wider and looser definition of autism has been trumpeted across the land through the media as an "epidemic" of increasing numbers of cases of autism. Before 1990, 1 child out of 2,500 was said to be autistic. This year, it is said to be 1 out of 88.
As Paul Sperry points out in IBD, "the number of language disorder cases have fallen as autism cases have risen, suggesting one disorder has simply been substituted for another."
Having heard, over the years, from many parents of late-talking children that they have been urged to let their children be diagnosed as autistic, in order to get either government money or insurance money to pay for language problems, I am not the least bit surprised by Sperry's findings.
Every dollar spent on children falsely labelled autistic is a dollar lost and urgently needed in dealing with the severe problems of genuinely autistic children. But money added to the federal budget for autism is money that can be given to people, in the expectation of getting their vote at election time.
Another example of words substituting for realities was a front page story in the May 24th issue of USA Today, showing that the official statistics on the national debt only count about one-fourth of what the federal government actually owes. Even the staggering official national debt is literally not half the story.
Under ordinary accounting rules and laws, the money promised to people as pensions when they retire has to be counted as part of the debts of a business or other organization. But, since Congress makes the laws, the trillions of dollars owed to people who have paid into Social Security do not have to be counted as part of the federal government's debts.
When you or I owe money, we are in debt and face consequences if we don't pay up. But we are not the federal government and cannot write our own accounting laws.
Perhaps the biggest frauds committed by redefining words are the many fraudulent uses of the word "poor."
For most of the history of the human race, there was no problem in defining who were "the poor." They were people without enough to eat, often without adequate clothing to protect them from the elements, and usually people who lived packed in like sardines in living quarters without adequate ventilation in the summer or adequate heat in the winter, and perhaps also lacking in such things as electricity or adequate sewage disposal.
Today, most of the officially defined "poor" have none of these problems, and most today have amenities such as air conditioning, a car or truck, a microwave oven and many other things that once defined a middle class lifestyle. Americans in poverty today have more living space than the average European.
Why are they called "poor" then?
For the same reason that autism, the national debt and many other things are redefined in completely misleading ways namely, to justify draining more money from the public in taxes, expanding the government, and allowing politicians to give handouts to people who are expected to vote for their reelection.
If we keep buying it, politicians will keep selling it.
” A few people may be taken in by the words of con men, here and there, but the larger tragedy is that millions more are taken in by the words of politicians, “
No self-respecting con man would sink to the level of “Politician”...
There *are* standards, y’know...
I’ve heard that it’s a common tactic shared among welfare moms to encourage their kids to act up in school in order to get them diagnosed with ADD so that the mom can get an additional “crazy check” for their “disabled” child.
I love the above phrase by Dr. Sowell.
Though they're top of the line con men only because they can pass laws to support their thievery.
Thanks for the ping jaz.
” The growing number of children encompassed by a wider and looser definition of autism has been trumpeted across the land through the media as an “epidemic” of increasing numbers of cases of autism. Before 1990, 1 child out of 2,500 was said to be autistic. This year, it is said to be 1 out of 88. “
Follow the money.
Wouldn’t be surprised. With as many people on the dole as there are they have a lot of time to think up such scams.
They still tend to think that if they just send another $1,000 to Nigeria - their MILLIONS will be ‘in the bank’. The woman who shotgunned her pastor husband in bed was a TWICE victim of this scam - and was mad at her husband for forbidding her to send more money!
Politicians are Conmen - and we need to first set out on the difficult task of convincing the electorate they were conned.
Look at Greece! The math doesn't add up - yet the people are poised to elect a man promising no austerity, national pride, full employment, sunshine and rainbow pooping unicorns for ALL!!!!
Thanks for the ping and as usual Dr Sowell hit the nail square on the head
Amen to that...Sadly there are far too many that are just too ignorant to ever understand that.
There’s no legal contract with social security.
Congress can change the law at will.
Congress can simply say all payments stop tomorrow. Social security taxes are just that taxes. Government collects the tax and spends it on whatever they please.
That’s the hard cold reality of it.
One other "hard cold reality" about that deal.....
The hard cold look in the eyes of all those shotgun-packin', blue-haired grandmas.
(I've drawn SS checks for five years now, I'm still a bit surprised when the money actually shows up and the day that it doesn't will just be yet another Gotcha moment. Does seem to be a bit of an oversupply of that sh** lately, though.)
My daughter worked in a social service agency whose main mission was to work with autistic kids as a therapeutic support specialist.
She told me that about 1 in 25 of her clients was genuinely autistic. The other 24 basically just had poor parenting and/or home environment.
Every one of these homes (the 24/25th) had televisions going at full blast, often multiple sets. The kids had all the latest in video games, X-boxes and the like. But the parents had no time to help them with their homework, get outside tutoring or even turn off the televisions or video games long enough to actually talk to the kids.
It didn't matter if the family was black or white.
A small number of them would actually take her advice and start spending some time with the kids reading books, playing a board game, tossing baseballs in a local park or anything which didn't involve electronics and funky techno sounds. Every one of these kids improved. As a side benefit, so did their non-autistic siblings and the parents.
But the majority of them just tolerated her visits as a condition to keep their government checks coming.
Damn, I just multiplied 88 x 25 and came up with 2,200. Why is that so close to the 1 in 2500 diagnosed in 1990?
It is good to see there are some in social services like your daughter that are genuinely trying to help and at least getting some results.
Loh gom uh key
I think of what Pothead Barry does as Obamachy.
That would be unicorns pooping rainbows of skittles ... well, it was, until Traytable gave the candies a whole new identity.
Or print our own money.